Dec. 6, 2011 (#976)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Dec. 6, 2011:
Liquidated by Movie Indoctrinated:
"SWAT Teams with Battering Rams Smashing Down
Your Door,
Shoot Your Dogs, Riddle the House, You're Face-Down on the Floor,
They're Mind-Bombed Video Gamers, Kitted Out in Black,
Substituting Military Hardware for Common Sense They Lack,
They've Seen Every Movie Where Force Wins the Day,
Pictured Themselves Fighting Terrorists on a Policeman's Pay,
Imagining the President Giving Them a Star,
All-American-Hollywood Hero, His Career Will Go Far,
In Reality He'll Kill Anyone, Not Just Household Pets,
For Years Police Recruiting Targets Drugged Out Vets,
Raiding the Wrong Houses, A Bloody Trail, All Spatter,
Knowing His Ass is Covered, Accountability Doesn't Matter,
We're Under Authoritarianism, Should Give Everyone a Chill,
Murderers for Hire are Coming for the Kill"
© Alan Watt Dec. 6, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Dec. 6, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
| cuttingthroughthematrix.com alternate sites: cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca |
mirror site: cuttingthrough.jenkness.com |
| European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up: alanwattsentientsentinel.eu | |
|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS: Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks & Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND – Click the link below for your location (ordering info): |
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on December the 6th 2011. For newcomers, you should help yourself to the web site cuttingthroughthematrix.com and download the audios for your leisure listening. There’s hundreds and hundreds to choose from and hopefully you’ll begin to understand this big very complex system, this overarching system, above politics, above the media, this system that really runs the world. I try to go through some of its history, at least when it bobbed up, down through time, and it does bob up under different names down through the centuries, and of course you end up with the Royal Institute of International Affairs today and the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, all part of the same group that decided a long time ago to take over the world and all of its resources, and to use specialists and experts to run the world rather than politicians. And we’re going through all the transitional phases right now. We’re living through them. People are adapting through them. It’s so surprising, people... they don’t have much reaction to it. They’ve been taught to always adapt and adapt and we are an adaptable species and so it’s very easy to go along with the changes that come along all the time. We’ve seen it happen with the big banking boys being appointed now, as Prime Ministers basically, by the big banking system that overlays everything, and no one’s making much of a fuss about it. And yet this is to be repeated elsewhere across the world, under the guise of saving the economy, saving the stock market and so on. And it will flow everywhere eventually. Once you let it happen in one country you’ll see it just monopolize all the rest. They’ll say, well they’re doing it over there, what’s wrong with doing it here? And we’re actually seeing it already because we have many appointees in all so-called democratic governments that are not elected. We have these science czars, with different czars appointed in the US. Canada has its own branch as well and so does Britain and all the other countries. So they’re gradually phasing in expert rule and phasing out the political system of elected representatives. We don’t need to have elected representatives anymore they claim because we’re run scientifically. And actually in many ways they’re right. We are run scientifically.
Help yourself to the audios and remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. You can help me tick along here by buying the books and disks at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you can also donate if you so wish. [Order and donation options listed above.] But as I say, it’s so strange to get a leg up you might say, even when you’re young, to understand the system you’re living through, understanding the cons from the past as well. You’ll find literally a group of people a long time ago, mainly bankers actually, decided to bring in this system. They foresaw the end of the industrial era coming, back in the 1800s, and they wanted to expand this into a global empire and grab all the resources of the world. It started with diamonds and gold and then it went into all minerals and all metals, everything you need in metallic industry, and then into food supplies, water supplies, roads. Everything basically is to go under this private feudalistic system which they said was the best form of rulership there should be. After all, they were the most evolved; they’d proven it by grabbing the world’s wealth already. They were already stinking rich and so were their parents before them and grandparents; therefore they were deemed obviously the fittest to rule the world, as they wrapped the Darwinian theology into their belief system. Now, the music’s coming in so I’ll be back with some of today’s, I hate saying stories, because that’s what they are. They give us stories, isn’t it? Back after this break.
Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix. As I say, money’s a great thing because no one understands it except the con men who invented it, and who have always dealt with it ever since. They can get you so lost just looking at how they make profit out of countries crashing and companies losing everything. They make money, they make profit off it, people losing. And we can’t wrap our heads round that kind of stuff because we’re taught to think in a linear fashion, whereas these guys don’t think in a linear fashion at all. They’re natural, in a sense, they’re naturally wild. Interesting term, wild, because that’s the term that Charles Galton Darwin talked about when he said, we’ll have to alter all the people by putting hormones in their food, etc, and literally reengineering them, but we, ourselves, being the elite must not do it to ourselves; we must retain our wildness, be the wild man, because we’ll have all our survival capabilities, like a good predator should. So you got to understand, these characters at the top are true predators, and they’ve been taught this by their parents and going way, way back. It’s a science, of course, they’re taught to themselves. And they can get their heads round all these little nooks and crannies that you cannot fathom. You’d never dream of what they can actually do, and make billions out of countries falling apart, even selling companies which they own themselves and then betting on them failing. I mean it’s just scam after scam and we take this for granted. And of course there’s no law on the books that says you can’t do it. Because you see, the same people run the law system and they make sure that they aren’t going to block their own escape hatches. Obviously.
That’s why they never ever change things after crashes. We always think of the Great Depression, that was one time when they did the big bank scam, but we forget that in the late 1800s, in the US alone, they had 2 major crashes in the late 1800s by Gould and Morgan and another one who got together and decided to crash everything. And they plundered everybody’s pensions even at that time, and private savings. And they never plugged the loophole. They would give you a new con and the new con of course, they have a lot of talk about it, lots of speeches are given by Presidents and Prime Minister across the world saying, this will never happen again, we’ve got new committees to oversee this kind of stuff. And it’s all nonsense because you have to look into what they’ve actually done, which is basically nothing. What they say is not legal you see. It doesn’t matter what they say. It’s what they write down and put in the books that’s legal.
And it’s the same thing that’s happening today as they go in with their Super Committees in the US, this new Super Committee that’s nowhere to be found in any Constitution, which they just decided to put it in themselves. It’s a form of technocracy, getting you used to technocracy, and rule by experts basically handling this vague system called money. And through money and through the debt of course they’re also achieving all their goals of putting in technocracy. And technocracy is actually a doctrine. It’s not just the technocrats. There’s one type of technocrat that’s a Brzezinski type or a Kissinger type who goes behind the scenes, goes across the world meeting very important people, getting things done, even getting wars started too, and they’re not responsible to the public. That’s one form. But the technocracy as a science is literally a world run by experts, from the top right down, to actually what they’ve got in Britain basically where social workers are involved now in everybody’s life. Everybody. And every child that’s born, there’s a whole massive system there to take care of that child and come into the home and go right through their whole life with them basically. That’s technocracy.
It’s just like when you’re in a form of communism – you don’t know you’re in the communism because no one in the media will use the word. That’s why you won’t connect what’s actually happening, even though every plank of the Communist Manifesto has been accomplished. It’s quite amazing how you perceive things and how you’re taught to perceive something and all you’re really doing is taking someone’s opinion from the media. We don’t really think critically about things and we’re not encouraged to think critically. Everything is groupthink at school, has been for years, and consensus in the classroom.
Money and debt has been the bane and the scourge of the planet since those who first came up with it ended up being the lenders, and it always will be as long as the same thing goes on; it cannot change. And it won’t change. It will make sure, since it’s in charge, it’s not going to change. But debt is a wonderful thing, isn’t it? It says here, this is last month...
U.S. Debt Tops $15 Trillion Mark Today
abcnews.go.com / Nov 16, 2011
(Alan: And we’re so used to... I can remember when billions was a lot of money, and even millions was a lot of money. And when Ronald Reagan was in I think, it was big, big news that they’d hit the trillion dollar mark for armaments. And everybody thought oh, wow. And here you are, the annual debt basically, 15 trillion dollars. And when they talk about balancing the budget they don’t mean actually paying off the debt. They’re trying to pay, for the year, the interest on the debt. So it’s never paid off. And that’s what interest is all about; it’s compound interest by the day, the month, the year, etc. So it says...)
Don’t look now, members of the “supercommittee” battling the national debt, but the amount the U.S. owes topped the $15 trillion mark Wednesday afternoon.
That’s a lot of George Washingtons, (A: And they give you a link to...) USdebtclock.org. (A: ...and it shows you all the bank notes.)
With a week until the committee’s deadline to reach agreement on cutting $1.2 trillion to $1.5 trillion from the federal deficit over the next 10 years, the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction still has no agreement to stem automatic cuts to the budget. (A: Now, how can they when they’ve got ongoing wars? And they talk on about how it used to be...)
The deficit has ballooned to nearly $48,000 for every man, woman and child in the U.S. (A: Now, by the way, when you think about that, you see, if you had a Visa card or a credit card, by the time you paid that off, at the minimum interest, you’re into the millions. You’re actually paying millions. So it’s really millions for every man, woman and child in the US.) This year alone, the U.S. will spend $1.3 trillion more than it takes in. (A: And I bet you it’s a lot more than that, that they have to borrow.)
But the bankers control the tune; they play the pipes and everybody dances to it basically. And no one’s got a clue how to change it because the ones who run that run your governments. It’s quite simple. They have their own guys in governments, you know, and they’re not about to sink themselves. I mean, that’s so much power to give up. Heady stuff, power, isn’t it? Very heady stuff.
Now, as we go into the open society, the open society is part of communitarianism, where no one can have any secrets at all when you’re in this new communist form of communitarian society, your little community there. Everyone must know about you and all your details and data must be up on the records, as you’re taken over by these new commissars when they decentralize governments. Now, they have different names for it in different countries but they call it communitarianism and the Great Society in Britain. In the US it was George Bush Sr. who first said communitarianism, used the word ‘communitarianism.’ And not one single person in the media says, that’s awfully like communism, you know, not one single person, because your media’s all controlled by the same people, and owned actually by the same people, who run the banks. Anyway, now the National Health Service, what’s left of it since everybody’s deserting in droves, even the surgeons, it says...
Everyone 'to be research patient', says David Cameron
bbc.co.uk / 5 December 2011
Every NHS patient should be a "research patient" (A: So in other words, if you’re a citizen of Britain and you’re on the National Health Service, then all your data is to be given to private companies now, to spread across the whole planet and sell it off, because you really are a “research patient.” You’re not a human being anymore. You’re a commodity; you’re a “research patient.”) with their medical details "opened up" to private healthcare firms, says David Cameron. (A: Who is the titular Prime Minister.)
The PM says it will mean all those who use the NHS in England will be helping in the fight against disease. (A: What a great con, eh? So give up your privacy to help fight disease... eh? Oh, it’s the same stuff as give up your freedom and all that to be protected.)
He hopes the result will be that patients get faster access to new treatments and Britain's life sciences sector will become a world leader. (A: And that’s what they’re calling it now, life sciences, as they experiment on you and kill you off. And last night I talked about The Pathways, to death basically, that they put you into. All they do is have a little dekko... a dekko’s a little peep, you know, at you, to see how old you are and kind of mentally judge you and aah, yeah, and then in you go into The Pathway and they starve you and just let you die off and that’s it. After all, it costs money to keep you alive, you know, once you’re sick. And old folk after all, they’re not producers anymore, you know. And that’s how it is. We’ve all been trained that way. Life is cheap now. It will become as cheap as China, as it is in China, because China’s the model state for the world. And we’re so degraded now too, and we accept all the stuff, even hanging bodies in displays of art, that are plasticized bodies. We don’t really mind. We’re really cheap now, aren’t we? Life is nothing at all. They’re even putting the morning-after pill on the supermarkets in the US. That’s part of the Obamacare project; they’re talking about doing that now. So you can get your headache pill and then you can get your abortion pill off the shelf and... you know. So the more we’re degraded, you see, the more all these agendas can go forth as they were planned to do. And we accept them. And all you are is a commodity in the hospital and they can experiment on you, because it’s going to help those in the future you understand. And if they think you’re a bit too old they’ll help you, they’ll help speed up the process by just starving you to death. Isn’t that a wonderful system? Hmm? So anyway...)
But critics say commercial interests are being put ahead of patient privacy. (A: You know, I wonder who these critics are. It’s always they’ve got available critics they pull from, just like these bioethicists that suddenly appeared when it came to basically euthanasia. They suddenly appeared out of nowhere; we didn’t know they existed. What? Bioethicists? All they are are people who’ve trained in eugenics, and economics. So what they do is balance the cost of life against the economic system. We can do wars and stuff because that brings in profit, you see, for the big boys who own your country, and you can plunder everything from them and the companies get very, very rich, even richer than they are already. But we ourselves are just peons. Mind you, we’re happy peons; most folk are happy peons today because they’ve never had so much fun. There’s so much cheap entertainment out there they can have fun, fun, fun and then they wake up when they’re 60 or so, and have never really matured until about then, as they try to pretend they’re teenagers, and then they get put down The Pathways into starvation and death, you know, [Alan laughing.] rather than collect your pension. Pensions after all, what are you going to use it on? You’re going to use it on food and stuff like that to keep yourself alive. I mean you know, the government needs that money. Just give it to them, and go quietly. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and lobbying of course is really, in a sense, from the elites’ point of view, lobbying is just their form of democracy. And that’s what democracy is, isn’t it really today? It is that way and it’s probably been that way for an awful long time, if not always. I mean, these big guys at the top of politics are highly unlikely to even seen an ordinary citizen about some problem. But they will see these lobbyists; they’re all on a first-name basis. You know, they jet each other around for holidays and stuff like that, you know. But it says...
Caught on camera: top lobbyists boasting how they influence the PM
independent.co.uk / Melanie Newman, Oliver Wright / 06 December 2011
One of Britain's largest lobbying companies has been secretly recorded boasting about its access to the heart of the Government and how it uses the "dark arts" to bury bad coverage and influence public opinion. (A: Well there’s nothing new in this; they’ve always done this.) An undercover investigation by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, published in The Independent today, has taped senior executives at Bell Pottinger: (A: That’s one of these lobbying groups.)
* Claiming they have used their access to Downing Street (A: That’s the British governmental, where the Prime Minister stays.) to get David Cameron to speak to the Chinese premier on behalf of one of their business clients within 24 hours of asking him to do so; (A: They actually got him to do it.)
* Boasting about Bell Pottinger's access to the Foreign Secretary William Hague, to Mr Cameron's chief of staff Ed Llewellyn and to Mr Cameron's old friend and closest No 10 adviser Steve Hilton;
* Suggesting that the company could manipulate Google results to "drown" out negative coverage of human rights violations and child labour;
* Revealing that Bell Pottinger has a team which "sorts" negative Wikipedia coverage of clients;
* Saying it was possible to use MPs (A: Members of Parliament...) known to be critical of investigative programmes to attack their reporting for minor errors. (A: Well the same thing we saw too with the whole Murdoch scam; they were into the same thing. Because after all, all media is a way of covering and burying and telling you what they want you to think and believe. They’ve always done this.)
Reporters from the Bureau posed as agents for the government of Uzbekistan – a brutal dictatorship responsible for killings, human rights violations and child labour – and representatives of its cotton industry in a bid to discover what promises British lobbying and public relations firms were prepared to make when pitching to clients, what techniques they use, and how much of their work is open to public scrutiny. (A: Remember, Fergie was doing that too, the Duchess, because her man at the time was in charge of all, basically, UK relations abroad for big contracts, big government contracts and she was taking £500,000 a time for it. She boasted about it when she was drunk, remember.)
In Uzbekistan, child labour is used in cotton fields (A: ...and so on and so on.)
'I've been working with Hilton, Cameron, Osborne, for 20 years'
The Bureau contacted ten London firms. Two refused to take the business, several others did not reply, while five including Bell Pottinger appeared to be keen to work with the fictitious Uzbek representatives. Bell Pottinger quoted "£1m-plus" as a fee for carrying out the work. (A: So money talks, doesn’t it, and morality walks.)
Their claims – which were secretly recorded – will add to mounting concerns that an absence of regulation has made London the global centre for "reputation laundering", where lobbyists work behind the scenes on behalf of the world's most controversial regimes. (A: It’s far more open in the US. It really is. It’s very open in the US, who’s lobbying who and who gets all the contracts and even gets to use the US military for its own agendas and things. It’s rather in the open there. But in Britain of course, they still try to keep up this stiff upper lip, we’re all goody-two-shoes because we all come from Eton and Oxford and Cambridge. But in reality they’re all as corrupt as can be because the society and the generation that grew up now, that’s in there, is utterly corrupt. That’s why.)
David Cameron pledged to tackle lobbying five years ago and then again last year, saying it was "the next big scandal waiting to happen" and "has tainted our politics for too long, (A: And then of course he got wrapped into the Murdoch stuff where Murdoch was flying him and all the other previous Prime Ministers, all over the planet on his private jet. Well, the bottom line is lobbying is their form of democracy; we don’t really count. Our job is just to get somebody in and then the lobbyists take over.
A good article too, it’s called...
SWAT Raids, Stun Guns, And Pepper Spray:
Why The Government Is Ramping Up The Use Of Force
huffingtonpost.com / 12/ 5/11
(A: It goes into all the scenarios and the reasons they’ve given for it.)
In February of last year, video surfaced of a marijuana raid in Columbia, Mo. During the raid on Jonathan Whitworth and his family, police took down the door with a battering ram, then within seconds shot and killed one of Whitworth's dogs and wounded the other. (A: They always go in and kill your animals first, you know. That’s to get you really enraged so as they can kill you.) They didn't find enough pot in the house to charge Whitworth with even a misdemeanor. (He was, however, charged with misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia when police found a pipe.) The disturbing video went viral in May 2010, triggering outrage around the world. On Fox News, conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer and Bill O'Reilly cautioned not to judge the entire drug war by the video, which they characterized as an isolated incident. (A: ...which of course it isn’t.)
In fact, very little about the raid that was isolated or unusual. For the most part, it was carried out the same way drug warrants are served some 150 times per day in the United States. The battering ram, the execution of Whitworth's dog, the fact that police weren't aware Whitworth's 7-year-old child was in the home before they riddled the place with bullets, the fact that they found only a small amount of pot, likely for personal use -- all are common in drug raids. The only thing unusual was that the raid was recorded by police, then released to the public after an open records request by the Columbia Daily Tribune. It was as if much of the country was seeing for the first time the violence with which the drug war is actually fought. And they didn't like what they saw.
That video came to mind with the outrage and public debate over the now-infamous pepper-spraying of Occupy protesters at the University of California-Davis protest earlier this month. The incident was just one of a number of high-profile uses of force amid crackdowns on Occupy protesters across the country . . . (A: Then they go on to name some of them. But then it goes into what’s happened over the last 30 years and I’ll touch on that after I come back from this break.)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and going over some of the history here that led up to the present system now of just battering down doors and firing off the guns. Because all these guys too, remember, dressed in the fancy outfits, have been dreaming all their lives, as they played all these video games, to actually live the real role. And here they are, they can go in and shoot people up and stuff. And I’m not kidding you. That’s why they created this generation to do so, because this is an authoritarian system you’re into now. It’s not democratic at all. It’s authoritarianism, and I mentioned that last night that the Club of Rome said back in the 70s they’d have to go into a post-democratic system, and it would have to be authoritarian in nature. So anyway it says...
Outraged by the Occupy crackdowns, some pundits and political commentators who paid little heed to these issues in the past are now calling for a national discussion on the use of force. That's a welcome development, but it's helpful to review how we got here in order to have an honest discussion.
Part of the trend can be attributed to the broader tough-on-crime and drug war policies pushed by politicians of both parties since at least the early 1980s, but part of the problem also lies with America's political culture. (A: I’d say it’s all the culture, worldwide, because it all comes from Hollywood.) Public officials' decisions today to use force and the amount of force are as governed by political factors as by an honest assessment of the threat a suspect or group may pose. Over the years, both liberals and conservatives have periodically raised alarms over the government's increasing willingness to use disproportionately aggressive force. (A: Actually it’s called, in many of the treaties they’ve signed at the United Nations, ‘overwhelming force.’ They have to meet all domestic quarrels even, with overwhelming force, which they do in Britain and elsewhere. They might get about 15 cop cars turning up and SWAT teams and choppers overhead over a man and a woman squabbling. That’s happened in the past.) And over the years, both sides have tended to hush up when the force is applied by political allies, directed at political opponents, or is used to enforce the sorts of laws they favor.
How We Got Here
According to Eastern Kentucky University criminologist Peter Kraska, the number of SWAT raids carried out each year in America has jumped dramatically over the last generation or so, from just a few thousand in the 1980s to around 50,000 by the mid-2000s, when Kraska stopped his survey. He found that the vast majority of the increase is attributable to the drug war -- namely warrant service on low-to-mid-level drug offenders. A number of federal policies have driven the trend, including offering domestic police departments military training, allowing training with military organizations (A: ...meaning regular troops.), using "troops-to-cops" programs (A: They hire them straight in from the war zones as policemen.) and offering surplus military equipment and weaponry to domestic police force departments for free or at major discounts. There has also been a constant barrage of martial rhetoric from politicians and policymakers. (A: It’s also the media and your movies. You’ve been brainwashed through the movies that this would all come, for years; long before it actually happened you were getting all these future scenarios, even from the old Star Wars movies onwards. You notice they were all dressed up in these armored outfits, and there were no faces to them. It doesn’t matter about the peons; they don’t need faces. You know, just behind masks; that’s what you see in these raids.)
Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they're fighting a "war," and the consequences are predictable. These policies have taken a toll. Among the victims of increasingly aggressive and militaristic police tactics: Cheye Calvo, the mayor of Berwyn Heights, Md., whose dogs were killed when Prince George's County police mistakenly raided his home (A: ...mistakenly.... this is a lot of mistakes made. Generally it’s the wrong house they go to and so on.); 92-year-old Katherine Johnston, who was gunned down by narcotics cops in Atlanta in 2006; 11-year-old Alberto Sepulveda, who was killed by Modesto, Calif., police during a drug raid in September 2000; 80-year-old Isaac Singletary, who was shot by undercover narcotics police in 2007 who were attempting to sell drugs from his yard (A: [Alan laughing.]); Jonathan Ayers, a Georgia pastor shot as he tried to flee a gang of narcotics cops who jumped him at a gas station in 2009; Clayton Helriggle, a 23-year-old college student killed during a marijuana raid in Ohio in 2002; and Alberta Spruill, who died of a heart attack after police deployed a flash grenade during a mistaken raid on her Harlem apartment in 2003. Most recently, voting rights activist Barbara Arnwine was raided by a SWAT team in Prince George's County, Md., on Nov. 21. (A: The police appeared to have raided the wrong house.) Police were looking for Arnwine's nephew, a suspect in an armed robbery.
The drug war has been the primary policy driving the trend but, since 2001, the federal government has also used the threat of terror attacks to further militarize domestic law enforcement. This includes not only finding new sources of funding for armor, weapons and gear, but also claiming new powers for the "War on Terror" that are then inevitably used in more routine law enforcement.
But paramilitary creep has also spread well beyond the drug war. In recent years, SWAT teams have been used to break up neighborhood poker games, including one at an American Legion Hall in Dallas. In 2006, Virginia optometrist Sal Culosi was killed when the Fairfax County Police Department sent a SWAT team to arrest him for gambling on football games. SWAT teams are also now used to arrest people suspected of downloading child pornography. Last year, an Austin, Texas, SWAT team broke down a man's door because he was suspected of stealing koi fish from a botanical garden. (A: SWAT teams because they think you might have stolen a fish!)
SWAT teams are even sent to enforce regulatory law now. In Hartford, Conn., a SWAT team recently raided a bar on the premise of suspected underage drinking. The same happened at a fraternity at Washington State.
Often, these inspections are merely a way for police to perform a full-on drug raid without the hassle of obtaining a search warrant. Tactical units in Orlando recently raided a series of black-owned barbershops under the premise of an occupational licensing inspection. Once inside, they then scoured the businesses, customers and employees for illicit drugs, mostly coming up empty. There have been similar incidents at bars, with police departments sending SWAT teams on drug raids under the cover of a regulatory alcohol inspection, and once again getting around the need for a search warrant. (A: So it goes on and on and on with these horror stories, just one after the other.)
And it’s just going to get worse folks because you see, no one cares. You see, we’ve copied the movies. Society has copied the movies. And the generation that’s doing all this, including the guys who are their officers, all grew up playing kill-kill-kill video games and now they can wear the real thing and do the real stuff. You see, society’s sick and broken. And the only way to stop it would be to fire them all, literally fire them all, bring in a new culture with some kind of morality, and train them all from scratch with a decent morality... to be actual policemen again, you know, guys you could ask the time from without getting shot. No kidding. That’s the only way you’re going to stop it. And it won’t happen of course, because as I say, everyone thinks it’s normal now. We’re trained that way. We’ve adapted.
Now, China, who owns an awful lot of the public debt of the US, they now want things in return, like your roads and your water and stuff like that, which of course is part of the big agenda as well.
Foreigners want America’s public assets
reuters.com / Dec 5, 2011
It seems like foreign governments and corporations are craving U.S. public assets like toll roads, electrical grids and railways. In the case of our largest creditor, the Chinese government, they don’t want any more U.S. Treasuries (A: Because they don’t trust them.), but they do want to own the hard assets that comprise our nation’s infrastructure.
Reuters Beijing bureau reported:
China may channel part of its huge pool of foreign exchange reserves into investment in U.S. infrastructure, including rail and transportation networks, Commerce Minister Chen Deming said on Friday.
“China is unwilling to take on too much U.S. government debt. We are willing to turn that money into investment,” he told U.S. Ambassador to China Gary Locke and U.S. businessmen. (A: In other words, they want to own it. And that’s just selling your assets for debt.
I’ll put these links up tonight too. Remember, all these articles I put up for your perusal at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the night. A good article too on...
Watching The Wheels Come Off The Green Machine
forbes.com / Op/Ed / 11/29/2011
(A: It’s a bit misleading too because believe you me, even though people think it’s all falling apart, we’ve all been signed on for more billions to stop climate change. [Alan laughing.] ...that’s like stopping the weather, eh? And it will continue. It’s a big thing.)
The body count continues to rise as the Green Jobs Revolution sputters its way to the end of a disastrous 2011. Few seemed to notice last week when the electric vehicle maker A123 Systems—poster child for successful clean tech investing—“temporarily” laid off 125 workers at its flagship manufacturing plants in Michigan on the eve of the Thanksgiving media break. It also reduced its earnings guidance for 2011 by $45 million, because its anchor customer, Fisker Automotive, “unexpectedly” delayed the production ramp-up for its Karma luxury electric car—again. (A: This article’s pretty good on who owns all these companies, and how much of your tax money’s funding them all. No wonder they’re all ticked off.)
Could these be the same plants that Democratic congressional leaders hailed as the birth of a new era in American manufacturing? The same plants that received a $249 million U.S. Department of Energy grant from the same stimulus money bucket that funded Solyndra? (A: You know, the solar panel collapse nonsense.) The same plants for which Michigan shelled out $125 million in incentives to lure away from Massachusetts?
Environmentally correct planners put all this public money to work to relieve the technology bottleneck they believed held back our transition to electric cars. So they invested my money and yours into building the largest lithium ion automotive battery plant in North America—to supply a Finnish electric car manufacturer backed by Al Gore’s venture capital fund and which received $529 million in federal loan guarantees. That Finnish manufacturer was supposed to begin production in 2009, but to date has only shipped 40 cars into the U.S. Those cars were delivered to a handful of millionaires and billionaires like Leonardo DeCaprio and Ray Lane who received tax credits because they bought an electric car. (A: ...from a foreign country with your tax money. [Alan laughing.] ...all made by your tax money. This is wonderful, eh.)
You can’t make this stuff up. Unless you are a central planner; then you can make up anything you want and get away with it as long as taxpayers keep writing checks, politicians keep spinning tales, and pundits keep giving them intellectual cover.
The coming glut of automotive lithium ion batteries will make for quite a fire sale. Forecasts made as recently as three months ago predicted that electric cars would become the leading application for lithium ion batteries by 2015, surpassing laptop PCs and other handheld devices. Who are they kidding? How many portable electronic devices do you own? How many electric cars have you ever even seen? By any rational standard the introduction of the Chevy Volt and Nissan Leaf, with fewer than 2,000 units sold between them last month, can only be described as disasters. (A: And it goes on and on and on.)
Anyway, everything’s a con isn’t it? It’s true what they say, you can keep the con going as long as you’re using taxpayers’ money. Taxpayers are just too happy, you understand. You know, they can still eat their chemicalized food, which they still think is food you know, and have lots of entertainment and get blotto on the weekends and party, you know. When that stops that’s when they get angry. They get angry because it stopped, not because they were living in a corrupt society. Anyway, Obama and the FDA, it says...
Obama FDA Considers Putting (A: The abortion pill.) Morning-After Pill on Supermarket Shelves
weeklystandard.com / 12/6/2011 / Jeffrey Anderson
I’ll put that link up as well. Good articles on Latin America. There’s a new bloc formed, their own form. It’s interesting because I wondered how they were going to do NAFTA. They were trying to get the whole of Latin America, one by one, brought into this NAFTA agreement, to be the same as Europe basically. That was the old, old agenda. So they’ve gone a faster way and that’s to create a Latin bloc first, Latin American. What they’ll do then is crash the economies of that and then they’ll bring the whole lot together into one with the US and Canada. I bet you that’s how they’ll play it. Anyway it says...
Latin American, Caribbean nations form new bloc - maimiherald.com / 12.05.11 / Jim Wyss
...the same ones that are to belong to the NAFTA, including the Caribbean; they’re all in it together. I’ll put that link up and you’ll see this big meeting too. I’ll put a link up with Chavez giving a speech at this so-called regional alliance.
Chavez heralds new regional alliance - youtube.com
But you wait and see, it’s a faster way to get the amalgamation done, rather than taking them on one at a time and bribing them. That’s how they generally do it, they bribe you, you know. Another interesting thing, it’s a bit of a fun thing, Israel put out a big campaign on American television to get the Israeli expatriates back, the ones who’d left Israel to go to America, to make lots of money. They put a campaign out to try and shame them and make them feel guilty and homesick to get them back to Israel. But because so many Jewish Americans complained about the ads they pulled them under Netanyahu’s orders. And you can watch this little video on that. And you’ll see some of the very famous names who were actually born in Israel that have been in the media prominently over the years.
Israel expat campaign angers Jewish-Americans - youtube.com
And, you know, I often wonder whether to even read this stuff because I’ve watched the decline of society for an awful long time. And I’ve really studied the history of Hollywood. I’ve really studied the history of where most of these geezers who ran Hollywood came from, from Germany and elsewhere before World War II and how they’d done the same degrading of society and how they just simply transported it into the US and did it all over again. But Hollywood and sexual abuse goes hand-in-glove. I mean, it’s always been that way. And some of the old books on Hollywood are quite amazing. Even I think one of the first movies they made was Babylon, I think they called it, an old black-and-white silent one. And they built a big wall around the set and they had all these actors and actresses in there dressed like nymphs. And this guy, this director from Germany carried a whip and he went around whipping them all, for weeks; no one could get in. Screams and hollers... I don’t think the movie was ever actually published to the public. Anyway...
Recent Charges of Sexual Abuse of Children in Hollywood Just Tip of Iceberg, Experts Say (A: It’s not just children; it’s everything.)
Meaghan Murphy / December 5, 2011 / FoxNews.com
(A: It goes through some of the well-known people and it says...)
If a spate of recent allegations proves true, Hollywood may have a hideous epidemic on its hands. . . .
(A: Now, that broke out too, many times over the years, with the same thing with Polanski who used to get some very well-known actors to basically invite young girls, after charming their mums, offer studio shots, and then would take them to Polanski’s residence there, who’d bathe them and then have sex with them. And that all came out in court years later and that’s why he’s over elsewhere. But it comes out every so often. Nothing ever happens about it because you see, the power, there’s a power mafia in Hollywood, who knows everything. They know everything that’s going on and they’ll keep everything under wraps as much as they can. Generally when they expose something it’s because someone’s done a dirty and broken one of their major rules, you know. Anyway...)
Martin Weiss, a 47-year-old Hollywood manager who represented child actors, was charged in Los Angeles on Dec. 1 with sexually abusing a former client. His accuser, who was under 12 years old during the time of the alleged abuse, reported to authorities that Weiss told him "what they were doing was common practice in the entertainment industry." Weiss has pleaded not guilty.
On Nov. 21, Fernando Rivas, 59, an award-winning composer for “Sesame Street,” was arraigned on charges of coercing a child “to engage in sexually explicit conduct” in South Carolina. The Juilliard-trained composer was also charged with production and distribution of child pornography.
Registered sex offender Jason James Murphy, 35, worked as a casting agent in Hollywood for years before his past kidnapping and sexual abuse of a boy was revealed by the Los Angeles Times on Nov. 17. Murphy’s credits include placing young actors in kid-friendly fare like "Bad News Bears," "The School of Rock," "Cheaper by the Dozen 2” and the forthcoming "Three Stooges.”
Revelations of this sort come as no surprise to former child star Corey Feldman.
Feldman, 40, himself a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, unflinchingly warned of the world of pedophiles who are drawn to the entertainment industry last August. "I can tell you that the No. 1 problem in Hollywood was and is and always will be pedophilia,” Feldman told ABC’s Nightline. “That's the biggest problem for children in this industry... It's the big secret.” (A: And other ones come up to the front and say it all happened to them too and so on and so on and so on, the usual stuff. Nothing will change though because there’s more to it, and there’s more to the whole idea, and people, of Hollywood than meets the eye. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ve got callers there. There’s Jeff from Long Island hanging on. Are you there Jeff?
Jeff: Hello, Alan. It’s a pleasure to speak to you. I’ve been following your work since about 2006 and supporting your efforts as well. I wanted to share with you something that happened to me today, because I’ve also faced, like many of the callers expressed over the years, a frustration with once you’ve put the effort and the time in to get your facts straight and to really figure out what’s going on and get past the awfulness of it all, you then want to decide for yourself what is something I can do that has meaning. Here in Long Island in Suffolk County, although symbolic, there was legislation heard today by the Suffolk County legislature regarding chemtrails and the spraying of various compounds including barium, aluminum and sulfur into the atmosphere. The room was packed, 130-plus people were there, 20 folks spoke; it went on for over an hour and a half. It was quite stimulating to see that when you think you’re alone, nonetheless you see a lot of folks articulate on the issues, expressing a desire to see things change, admonishing the legislature for ignoring what’s apparent over their very eyes. I know you’ve spoken about this yourself, where if we won’t even address what’s happening right above our very eyes then what good are we? It felt good to finally get behind something with the knowledge, with the information that you’ve helped me, you know, find through various resources and recommendations for books and articles. And I just wanted to suggest to folks that if they want to get personally involved, well it worked for me, perhaps if we all kind of looked at our local government as a possibility, as a stepping stone for making this assault on us more public and getting more folks aware. It has to start somewhere and perhaps that could be the small stone that starts rolling down the hill.
Alan: It’s a matter of people actually getting off their hind and getting out there. They’re protesting Wall Street and all the rest of the stuff but if you can’t breathe in the future what’s the point, you know; you’re going to be dying off with emphysema. You got to get active and get involved and let all these guys know that you know who they are, you vote them in, you can vote them out, and you know who’s responsible for it. But this is a big agenda. You’re quite right. I recently read articles where they’ve had their annual meetings about geoengineering. Canada have had top so-called experts on geoengineering on radio, CBC, last weekend, and they called the program SPICE by the way, S-P-I-C-E – you can look it up – this program of they want to add more stuff to the spray. They want to put metallic particles that will float like mirrors and reflect the sunlight outwards again, let less sunlight reach the earth. We’re already in global dimming – they admit that – and we know that that coincided from NASA from their timetable with the beginning of the spraying in 1998. So they’re going full-steam ahead with this, but people are coming down sick with it, that’s the bottom line. And they know this too. They have all our health records. Everything’s computerized now, instant feedback to Washington DC and in Canada it’s in Ottawa. They get all the feedback so they know what they’re doing to us and until we hold them to the fire they’re just going to keep denying it, you know, and keeping us busy elsewhere.
Jeff: For me personally it was very invigorating to see a room full of strangers where it wasn’t a group subject to infiltration, like perhaps the Occupy movement can be accused of, to see just almost this spontaneous gathering of folks, young and old, business suits to casual dress, various folks, all in an invigorating, energetic manner, citing the facts, showing they’re aware. And I would just suggest to those folks over the years and currently who are frustrated by what they can personally do to combat this awful stuff going against us, to consider the local level and organize at a grass roots level and participate.
Alan: Absolutely. You got to organize at the grass roots level. You got to get your own mandate out there. And whenever you see it yourself, the system, or your group deviating from your mandate, you’ve been infiltrated, you got to kick the top ones out and start all over again. And just keep at it and at it and at it. Absolutely. That’s the way to do it.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. Remember, help me out too at this end and buy the books and donate. See you tomorrow.
Topics of show covered in following links:
US Debt Topped 15 Trillion Dollars in November
Every
NHS Patient to be a Research Patient as Private Companies get Access to
Everyone's Private Records
FDA Considering Putting Abortion Pill on Supermarket
Shelves
Large Government Lobbying Company Secretly Recorded
Why Government is Ramping up Use of Force
China Wants US Assets
Watching the Wheels Come Off Green Machine
New Bloc of Latin-American nations
Chavez
Hails New Regional Alliance
Israeli
Advertising Campaign Aimed at US Israelis angers Jewish Americans
Sexual Abuse of Children in Hollywood
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||