February 11th, 2011 #767
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt February 11th:
Democracy is Plutocracy,
Controlling Truth -- Indoctrinate Youth:
"At the Risk of Being Stoned I Have to Be Blunt,
The Fantasy of Democracy's a Corporate Front,
In Globalist Agenda, Nothing's as it May Seem,
Where a Compliant Workforce Live in a Dream,
As They're Prompted and Guided in What to Think,
Media-Prodded to Look at World's Latest Stink,
While at Home, Post-Democratic, Here's Austerity,
Democracy Raped Sheeple with Usual Severity,
Imprison Banksters? No, Offer Them Thanks
After Bi-Centennial Plunder, Give Bailouts to Banks"
© Alan Watt February 11th
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - February 11th, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
| cuttingthroughthematrix.com alternate sites: cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca |
mirror site: cuttingthrough.jenkness.com |
| European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up: alanwattsentientsentinel.eu | |
|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS: Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks & Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND – Click the link below for your location (ordering info): |
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix, on the 11th of February, 2011. I always suggest at the start of the show that new comers look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com, where you can help yourself to hundreds of audios for download, and hopefully I'll help to piece together this big system in which you live, this big Matrix system where perceptions are distorted and turned 180 degrees. How psycholinguistics is used. How massive foundations with hundreds and hundreds of think tanks working with non-governmental organizations run your world and plan the future. They know exactly where they're going with it, and you've been really conditioned your whole life towards it, whether you know it or not. So were your parents, in fact. But it's getting more obvious today, for those in the know who are awake. And there's not too many, unfortunately, who are completely awake to all of this.
So, help yourself, to the audios, and remember too, you're the audience that bring me to you. So, you can support me by buying the books and discs I have for sale, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You can use a personal check to order from the US to Canada. You can also use an international postal money order from the US to Canada, or send cash, or use PayPal. Use the donation button you'll see on the .com site. And follow it up by an email, with your name, address, and the order, and I'll get it out to you. Across the world, you can use Western Union for fast wire transfer. You can also use Money Gram, which I think wires as well, but they give you the option of sending a check, which you can post. It's far cheaper. Some people just send cash, and again, PayPal, just send the donation, and follow it with an email, your name, address, and order, and I'll get it out to you as fast as I can.
On this particular program, it's a hard word to use, program. I don't want to program you. That's why they call them radio programs, you get programmed. Same with television too. And it's not a show, because it's not show business that I'm doing here. It's really educational. On this particular talk though, and all the talks, I try to piece together how the system really is working all together. All sides work together, really, in the dialectical game that's put out there. And they use deception. They must always get the compliance of the public. You must get them on board with every part of the agenda. And across the whole world now, we're getting the supposed color revolutions where people just suddenly decide they want something called democracy, and I hope once they get it, they can come back over to our countries and show us how it's done. Because we've never had it ourselves. But the mainstream media are all on board with it. The same mainstream media that keep you in the dark about all the big things that are happening to you, and who never have a cry out when we're getting massively taxed or raped and pillaged by the banks, or your own governments. You know, the media is very quiet on these topics, but suddenly they're your friend.
And you're all forgetting that with this Egyptian thing that's going on over there. You're all forgetting it. You're getting caught up in this fervor, this "youth generated" fervor, that somehow, something wonderful is happening to the Egyptians, and it takes your mind off what's happening at home, as rations are being cut, even fuel rations in the States now, to the elderly in some places, thanks to Obama. But that's little print in the newspapers, as opposed to the big stories of someone else's supposed happiness, as more puppet regimes are installed in place, across the world. And that's really what's happening in Egypt. It was time for the old fellow to go. He'd served them well. And he will leave eventually with lots of his loot. They always do that with their pals. And he'll live happily ever after, he and his family. And that's how it's done. They did the same thing a long time ago with Uganda, when Idi Amin was forced out, and he left with millions and millions of pounds worth of his loot, with his family. And he got a beautiful place in California and somewhere else across the world too. So, they're all pals with it, and it's time for them to go, and they know it. They're in for a particular amount of time. And as I say, it's geo-politics, but there's more to it than that. And I'll touch on this, when I come back from this break.
Hi folks, we're back, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix. And there's an old saying, you know, it says, fool me once, shame on you, and fool me twice, shame on me. And we should always remember that, because when is your media going to be your friend? They're suddenly your friend, and they're cheering for some poor downtrodden people somewhere across the planet. It's the same media that keeps it quiet when they're plundering those same countries, and suddenly they're your friend. It's just astonishing how folk fall into it. We're given our arguments. We're given the topics even to talk about, because technically, we should be talking about nothing except what's happening back home, where you're trying to get back what your parents and grandparents fought to achieve in the first place. We've lost everything. I'm going to put up a video tonight and it shows you Brzezinski, when he went over to Afghanistan to stir up the Jihad. And I've had this up before, this particular video. I'll put this up with another one, and this article, and you actually hear him talking to what was the beginning of the Muslim Brotherhood, where he was stirring them to fight the Soviets, who had gone into Afghanistan at that time. And so, it's good to know the players and things, and who's behind it and what's happening, to understand anything at all. And you've got to have some kind of memory, and you have to put two and tow together for yourselves.
This article here says:
Obama's calls for the resignation of Mubarak come as no surprise to anyone who's been watching this to any length at all. It's well worth going into who the players are, in this attempted revolution:
1) April 6 and Kifaya kicked off the rebellion, and the Muslim Brotherhood is sustaining it. These are the trademark Brzezinski/Soros puppets that are always used to kick off these 'UN soft power revolutions': NGOs, student groups and Leninist vanguards attached to Wall Street foundations (Alan: And that's a fact folks. That's who runs the Leninist bunch) (in this case, the Freedom House Foundation, the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict and the International Crisis Group). (A: And I've mentioned all these a few weeks ago, because you find that Brzezinski and these boys happen to run all of them.) It's the same MO as in all other color revolutions - for ex., Tunisia, Iran and the Ukraine.
2) The coordinating factor here is the International Crisis Group, a UN front staffed by people such as Brzezinski, Soros, Wesley Clark, Solana, Shimon Peres and, of course, El Baradei. This is the guy who was chosen to take over. (A: That's the latter one.) The motive here is to install a puppet islamo-socialist regime similar to the ones in Iraq and Afghanistan. Baradei is the guy chosen to bring it in, and the Muslim Brotherhood will be its pillar and its sustaining force.
3) The Muslim Brotherhood (MB) deserves a section of its own here. The MB (A: It's not Men in Black, it's the Muslim Brotherhood.) has always been the prime British intelligence asset in the region, being instrumental during the Nasser affair. It's an incredibly important player in the entire Middle East, given the power of its influence networks; its function has always been to take leadership over the Sunni and get an anti-Shia Jihad going. This divide & rule game has helped keep the region in tension ever since WWII, and is now being played out like never before. For NATO, these MB ghouls are the 'good' radical Muslims: they're ardent Fabian socialists, (A: And by the way, they are Socialists, and actually Marxists, a lot of them too.) at their inner circle, and they're the ones who provided the man power and the ground networks to set up the NATO protectorates of Kosovo, Albania, and Bosnia.
The MB was also the breeding ground for characters like Ayman al Zawahiri and many other organizers of Qaeda, during the 80s. There is no reason whatsoever to suppose their cooperation has somehow ended, in the meantime (that cooperation was alive and well in 2001), yet that subject is rarely, if ever discussed, on the mainstream.
(A: And that's true too, because you're not supposed to know what's going on.)
The OBJECTIVE. Nothing here is happening by chance. The plans for North Africa and the Middle East are laid out in the Brzezinski/Bernard Lewis/PNAC doctrine. The first stage was to create what Brzezinski called "imperial mobilization" into the region, to establish a permanent international military presence -- that was accomplished with the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. At the same time, as Brzezinski said, in The Grand Chessboard (1997), that imperial mobilization would come hand in hand with the setting up of a police state structure in the west.
(A: You think these guys don't know where they're going?)
The next stage is to completely shred the region, bit by bit, nation by nation. This will be done through these collectivist, islamo-socialist regimes, that are meant to destroy traditional Muslim culture, (A: And that's a fact. They must destroy the culture.) create civil wars, and even regional wars, in the medium/long run. (A: And that's true too, because Brzezinski and Kissinger both said it would be better if we had factional wars going and civil wars, after we've been in and we leave what's left of the countries to them, once we've bombed them out of existence. It would be good to keep going with civil wars for a long time.)
In the end the whole area will have been deculturalized, wrecked, and broken up into many mini-states, which will be production hubs run by global agencies such as the IMF and the World Bank, and policed by international forces. In other words, the end of the nation-state, and the coming of a neo-feudalist system, run by international financiers, using international agencies as their enforcement arms.
This, of course, will not happen within a vacuum. During this period, many (real) terror and panic migrations will be exported into Europe, and the economic downturns caused by restlessness in the Middle East (particularly in oil prices) will cause the western economies to further collapse into a poverty, two-class status. These things will allow for the "order out of chaos" projection that was described in the 2006 "Strategic Trends Report", by British military intel. (A: And I've got it on my website, that whole report. It's 90-odd pages. Go into the archives section. And also, check it out later with the US one, which came out later in the year. They're identical for the future planning.)
It's also the "great transition" that the UN and its many institutes harp on about. The complete end of the nation-state and its replacement with global and regional management bodies. (A: Now what was it the head of the European Union said recently? And I read it from their own newspaper. He said it was the end of the nation-state, folks.) Constant crisis and conflict, to allow for that transitional process. Economic, social, cultural standardization, of the entire globe.
In the end, a few decades from now, these boys expect to achieve their system of global governance, whereby local populations will be ruled by continental authorities who will, in turn, report to a worldwide body: a 'world state'. It's just the old project of a world society, of scientific socialism and high-tech feudalism, that was put forth by characters such as Hegel, Bentham, St. Simon and Lenin, and is now being carried out by monopoly capitalists.
People have to go keep wising up to the techniques being used, and denouncing them for what they are.
And ain't that a fact. So I'll put that link up tonight, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, at the end. And, as I say, you'll see Brzezinski on the video too, stirring up the Jihad in the Muslim Brotherhood, to have a Holy War. That's what he says, Yours is a Holy War. As long as they were fighting the Soviets at that time. That's the reality of it. I mean, people have to stop being fooled. Stop being fooled. Have you noticed too, the young women too, who are often the spokespeople for these groups over in Egypt are speaking perfect Oxford English? Hmm? Haven't you noticed things, little hints like that?
Meanwhile, supposedly as we're supposed to be cheering on, so happy for folk getting democracy, as they call it. It says here:
Military help sought on Canada-U.S. border
(A: And this is from the CBC)
With the U.S.-Canada border under sudden intense scrutiny in the United States, a handful of American senators placed it under an ever-harsher spotlight Thursday by asking for the military's help in patrolling the boundary.
(A: Now, I'll tell you right off the bat, you see, the US were told pretty well nothing about this integration of the US-Canada border; but, thanks to shows like this, the word got out. And so this is their counter, to try to give a counter stance to con the public in the US again, that they're actually, oh, they're more afraid of the Canadian border than you can imagine. In other words, it's propaganda, put out by Psyops.)
Democratic senators from states located near or along the 6,400-kilometre border are asking the U.S. Department of Defence to provide military radar in an effort to nab drug traffickers who use low-flying aircraft to move their product from Canada into the United States.
That's their excuse about it. Now, they've been doing this forever. Years and years and years they fly, mainly and BC, mind you. And this is their excuse about it. So, I'll put this talk up tonight, as well, and it's a PR piece, as I say, to try and diffuse the fact that they've integrated the border patrols. Intelligence services are integrated. And the fact that US and Canadian intelligence agencies can share all the citizenries of the whole of North America, all their data, from the same computers. Just to let you know, if you didn't know what was going on there.
And another article too, was from the Toronto Star, which generally is further left than Marx. It says:
Canada kept U.S. border talks under wraps
(A: And that's true. They always give you a Sun and a Star. Have you ever noticed that? A Sun and a Star. You know, one is supposed to be right wing, and one is supposed to be left wing. And I think the Star was bought over by the teacher's union some years ago. And Peter Worthington who wrote for it for years said this was the last time he would be able to say any truth. Ha, ha. So, anyway.)
Canada kept U.S. border talks under wraps: document
The federal government deliberately kept negotiations on a border deal with Washington secret while it planned ways to massage public opinion in favor of the pact, according to a confidential communications strategy.
The 14-page public relations document recommended that talks keep a “low public profile” in the months leading up to the announcement by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and U.S. President Barack Obama. At the same time, the government would secretly engage “stakeholders” — interested parties such as big business groups and others — in a way that respected “the confidentiality of the announcement.”
(A: Meaning it was to be totally secret.)
In advance, the government departments involved — including industry, foreign affairs, international trade and citizenship and immigration — were to “align supportive stakeholders to speak positively about the announcement,” according to the strategy prepared by Public Safety Minister Vic Toews’ officials.
(A: So, in other words, they use their PR teams on what to say to the public, if anything at all.)
On Friday, Harper and Obama signed off on a plan that for the first time envisions throwing up a single security ring around the perimeter of Canada and the U.S.
That's the whole border of North America, folks. That's what it's about, not the border between Canada and the US. Back with more after this.
Hi folks, we're back, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix. Reading this article about basically, the integration of Canada and the US, that's ongoing, year by year, as they sign more integration schemes and documents and so on. Same formula as they used for the European Union, and I lived through all of that nonsense as well, with the same nonsense coming from governments, as they went over to form closer ties, closer ties. I thought, well, how close can you get? That sounds rather sexually strange here. And of course, you end up with integrated everything. That's what they're doing here. It says here.
Harper and Obama signed off on a plan that for the first time envisions throwing up a single security ring around the perimeter of Canada and the U.S.
(A: Now, they've been working on that for years, because in 2006 they called it Fortress America. And they showed you, the same media, of course, that help you—stay in the dark, that is—showed you a big map of this big Canadian Fortress Ring, including America as well, all around the coastlines of Canada and the US. One system. And they talked about integrating everything else at the same time.)
The wide-ranging blueprint calls for increased cooperation between the two countries’ police, border and intelligence agencies; an integrated Canada-U.S. exit-entry system using high-tech identification techniques and more sharing of information about Canadians with U.S. authorities.
At least three major business organizations (A: And they're the only ones that count.) — the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Canadian Trucking Alliance — quickly issued statements praising the framework agreement Friday.
(A: That's because they were in on it for the last six months.)
The document was prepared last fall, when the Canada-U.S. talks were being conducted without any public notice.
(A: That means even informing us.)
Under “communications challenges,” the document lists: “Greater information sharing is part of the initiative. (A: Democracy is wonderful, eh?) The safeguarding of privacy and sovereignty will be of concern for Canadians.”
(A: Oh, oh, yeah.)
It also says Canadians may be too sanguine about security to see the need for the deal. “The Canadian public may underestimate the security threat to Canada.”
(A: Well, it's their government it seems to me.)
The confidential government document also contains a list of “high risk” stakeholders — those in Canada who might raise strenuous objections to stepped-up Canada-U.S. security arrangements.
Officials surmised that Jennifer Stoddart, the federal privacy commissioner, would be worried by plans to share more personal data on Canadians with U.S. authorities.
(A: Well, actually, you see, they always give you, in democracy, in democratic countries, like Britain and so on, and the British Commonwealth, which still exists in Canada, you always get a Privacy Commissioner, who's paid by the taxpayer, and he sits in Parliament, but he can't do anything. They tell you that. They always tell you what to be worried about, but then they say, we have no authority to do anything about it. Anyway, it says:)
“Will raise concerns re information sharing and protecting private information,” the document says of Stoddart. In response, the government should stress that “we value and respect our separate constitutional and legal frameworks that protect privacy, (A: As they give it all away. Is this beautiful doublespeak? Isn't it?) civil liberties and human rights.” It also recommended “ongoing engagement by officials” with Stoddart.
Advocacy and civil rights groups such as the Council of Canadians, led by Maude Barlow, were also expected to react negatively because of “privacy concerns.”
(A: Maude Barlow I really think is a front too, because I remember when they were putting up the negotiations in France, for the World Trade Organization to do with investment in countries, where they could literally come into a country, and if you demanded that this factory that they were going to set up would go along with your minimum wages and so on, and you didn't, then they could sue the country. And she was allowed into it. The only person I think allowed into it that was from the public. And when she came back out, she said that she complained about the wages of people in China. Nothing to do with Canada. Anyway:)
The strategy paper again recommended that Conservatives should stress Canada’s protections for human rights and privacy. It also suggested (A: Well, suggesting means nothing. You can suggest all you want. Their minds are made up and they've done it. It's all gone ahead.) that cabinet ministers be made available to the media to counteract Barlow’s statements.
And then it goes, refugee and immigration organizations, and so on are all upset, yadda, yadda, yadda, yah. So, it's the same thing. It's the European Union, once again, only it's in North America, with the same little comments getting made. I think they just copied the same script from Europe in fact, and the same public relations. It worked there. It will work anywhere, I suppose. And remember, Karl Marx talked about this in the 1800s, a unified Europe and a unified Americas, for trading, and a Far East/Pacific Rim region. That's all pretty well been done, and we're going through the last parts of it now, just the tidying up parts, you know the fine print and stuff like that.
Another article too, I'll put it up tonight is "The Weather Isn't Getting Weirder." And that's from the Wall Street Journal, and they give you the facts as opposed to the hype, and the hyperbole, about, oh, my God, it's chilly. And it's this and that and the other, and global warming, and so on, and so on, that we're so fed up with. They go through the actual facts, as opposed to the computer simulations. The simulations get what they want them to say. And the facts don't measure up at all. And I'm sure we're so sick of hearing about the battle between the warmists, the non-warmists, because it's an agenda to tax us all into death, and to get us working for peanuts, and all our cash that used to be used for consumerism, you see, in a post-consumer society, is to go to help the World State. So they're using it as a guise to tax us and set up the World State system. That's what it's about. And of course, to keep those who are rich – I mean, talking about really rich – getting even more stinking rich. And that's what it's about folks. Quite something, isn't it? And we're living through it. We're all living through this amazing transformation.
And then, of course, there's the International Monetary Fund. Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who's always waltzing around, talking about new currencies, he's come out again, and demanding a new world currency will stabilize this system. Of course, they'll run it for you too, and don't you love just World Banks and stuff like that. They've been awfully good to you in the past. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, we're back, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix. We truly are living in Disneyland. I said it on 2001, I think it was the night that the big thing happened. I said that the hardest thing from now on would be holding on to your sanity. And it truly is, when you look at this roller coaster of bizarreness, as we're going through, not just in the money system and so on, but in everything, the way the media is using more psychological tools and techniques to get into your heads and so on, and create opinions about things. Getting everyone fighting about all the wrong things of course, and manipulating our thoughts. It's a very, very big part of all of this, because neuroscience is well involved now with everything that happens in all the media. And since all media takes its cues from about two or three sources, they make sure that they all parrot the same stuff.
And not only that, all the little opinions and so on, even the political correctness that the Tavistock Institute and the other groups that work with it, put forth, you know, to be parroted, come through comedies and movies and soaps and everything else that you watch. Even ads now. So, you're being brainwashed one way or another in how to think, how to behave. You're being programmed without even knowing it. And that's how people really are conditioned. You don't realize you personally are being conditioned. You go along with the crowd, and the crowd will always go along with each other, and that's how easy it is to control lots and lots of people. The big boys themselves said it was often harder to indoctrinate an individual than it was a whole crowd of people, because the crowd want to emulate the others, especially those with leadership qualities, those that seem to have authority or spoke with authority. They'd parrot what they said themselves. And that is so incredibly, incredibly true. Now, there's an article from the UK Column that touches on this, and I've gone through some of these organizations now that work with governments on psychological warfare on your old brain box, and governments are really into it big time, always have been mind you, but they're really rolling ahead. So, this is the UK Column, and you'll find that at the UKcolumn.org, and it's Issue 1, 2011, on page 11 it says:
On 3 January 2011, following the UK Column's lead article exposing insider dealing between the Cabinet office (A: That's the upper political bunch; they split them into cabinets.) and political behavioural training charity Common Purpose, the Independent newspaper revealed that David Cameron had also set up a Cabinet Office Behavioural Insight Team. (A: And I gave the government website on that too. I've got it in my archives section.), Formed in July last year, the secretive cell is tasked to "dream up psychological tricks to alter our behaviour" - and on a massive scale.
The Independent article warned how the public is to be reframed (A: They call it, or nudged as Sunstein talks about it) or “nudged” into politically acceptable "Social Norms"; (A: New normals), starting with healthy eating (A: Now, healthy eating is your GMO food and vegetarianism, of course), voluntary work, and tax gathering. (A: You have to be trained to help the environment through excessive taxing. And you're going to be trained to feel good about doing it.)
While this may seem innocent to some people, these early ‘soft’ targets are already being greatly expanded to include wider central government ideological and political agendas, including Cameron's socialist straitjacket of the Big Society. (A: As he calls it. As they supposedly decentralize authority down to the local level. Then that's where big business in your area takes over and runs your councils, the new councils.)
Elite multi-millionaire Socialist and Tory Chancellor George Osborne has already signed up to Behavioural Economics - another form of mental reframing of individuals and groups, specifically to achieve political economic objectives. Their theory and intent is, that once mentally retrained, we “willingly rush to pay excessive taxes”. (A: And that's no kidding, folks. That comes out of neuroscience and it's part of behavioral economics.)
The danger is that we are to be trained to believe what our politicians and public sector - The State - says is right. (A: And true.) And we will not even be aware that we have been ‘reframed’ to think so. Never mind the basics - politicians have been proved corrupt, deviant, liars - the Soviet Union would have paid in blood and gold for Cameron’s political mind-control initiative to lock people in a hive mind.
Our investigation of little known Rosie Donachie, who is part of the Behavioural Insight Team under Maude, Gus O’Donnell and David Halpern, reveals that Donachie is a key player and go-between in the mental attack on the British public.
Aside from her position as Senior Advisor with the Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team, (A: We really are in the New Soviet folks. If you don't know it. We really are deeply inside it.) she is also a Trustee of the Franco-British Council, and is involved with the Party of European Socialists based in Brussels.
Not surprisingly for her murky role, she even has two names, being referred to as Rosalin in her Franco-British guise. Tracking Mrs Donachie’s path led UK Column investigative reporters to discover that on 17 November 2010, the Franco British Council had hosted a meeting inside 10 Downing Street (A: that's where the Prime Minister is) attended by a mix of the Cabinet Behavioural Team and their French counterparts.
Alongside Donachie and others, a key attendee at the secretive meeting was top French mind-bender Professor Olivier Oullier, who works directly within French President’s Sarkozy Private Office. The meeting was instigated by Rohan Silva of the No. 10 Policy Unit following consultation with the Centre for Strategic Analysis of the Prime Minister of France with the aims of: “bringing together experts on behavioral Economics from France and the UK and to seek cross fertilization and generation of concrete proposals through open discussion”, and “to look at practical applications for the science of Behavioural Economics in France and the UK in light of the economic crisis.”
(A: You're really in the world of Orwell. It's all here. It's all here.)
Rohan Silva is Senior Policy Advisor to David Cameron and he also sits on the Advisory for progressive Conservatism at DEMOS
(A: Now, it's amazing, the Progressive Conservatives, one of their main think tanks is called DEMOS. Now, look into the history of DEMOS, it was a top Marxist think tank. Still is. For those who don't get it that capitalism and communism, cap-com, is the same thing, run by the same big bankers.)
There is, no doubt, an inclination to laugh at the idea that we can be mentally ‘reframed’ or ‘reprogrammed’ into new belief systems and patterns of behaviour. But clearly these people have not been assembled behind closed doors to play games. A simple click on Google will reveal thousands of NLP training organisations, leadership trainers and consultancies. They all state that they can and do change people’s minds. They earn money from doing so. Moreover, whilst NLP and other mental reframing techniques can be used for therapeutic purposes, any technique interfering with the human mind has risks. These may manifest as adverse personality changes, stress or depression.
(A: Or even, I'd say, the worst disease of all is political correctness.)
Stating that: “behavioural economics can be a powerful tool for improving lives when used with care”, the No. 10 meeting was clearly aware of risks to individuals and the wider public, but according to the notes of the meeting released, seemingly failed to discuss or document those risks.
The truth of the meeting at No. 10 is deeply sinister. Modern behavioural manipulation techniques, which includes NLP, can and do, achieve changes in people's behaviour, particularly where the victim, individual or group, adult or child, is unaware that they are being targeted. It is perfectly feasible, as the attendees of No. 10 are fully aware, to implement political agendas and doctrine by reprogramming people. Consider Hitler Youth, or the Communist Chinese onslaught on the minds of children and young people. These latest insidious techniques, do not have that raw brutality, but unchecked, their stealth, effectiveness, and viral spread presents a far greater danger. Behavioural reframing for health, voluntary work and taxes today - and eugenics tomorrow. We have been warned.
And that's one of the better articles I've read for a while, because it's absolutely true. And they are, and they do constantly bombard you with politically correct messages about everything. In fact, the Frankfurt School were the ones who dreamt up all the idea of political correctness, and how they'd lambast anybody who would use a certain term, a word, a phrase, whatever. It didn't matter if the person was right about something, they were to altogether in unison condemn that person with a nasty term to paint them as dirty and bad and so on. And that's how you're trained so easily along the road into political correctness, until you're all like dummies together, denying that the sky can be blue, where of course, you find Bertrand Russell and others said they could actually convince children that the blue sky was black, and even snow would be black, and they'd all believe it. That can actually be done. Believe you me. It can be done.
Now, there's a caller from Canada. John, from Canada. Are you on the line John?
John: Hello, Alan. I'd like to specifically bring about an example where people are controlled as you've suggested, by our media. Although, I have a slightly different angle. I'd like your take on it, and hopefully I can get the words out in thirty or sixty seconds. A great example I like to show is BGH. Bovine Growth Hormone. In Canada, we had our health food Canada Safety Group, eight scientists come together to speak in Ottawa. And they said, listen, we can't explain why Americans can't freely discourse amongst themselves the scientific poison that they put into their milk, but we recommend, as scientists who measure these things, to ban it from being brought across the border. It screws up our endocrine system. It's a synthetic hormone. They do it for profit, but it poisons their children. Here's the science. Here's what this body that serves the Canadian interest thinks on this issue. So, in Canada we banned it. We said, this is poison. We try to communicate to Americans. Now on your side, you have Fox/bghsuit.com have covered this issue. And what they do is Fox News lies to the suckers. They say, hey, it's perfectly fine. There's nothing hazardous in drinking your milk. Drink your milk. Drink up, little child victim. And there was a suit brought against, and the suit won, but still, Fox News will still lie to the suckers. Now, people will say, well you can't fix it because everything the government does is bad. Every time you try to fight for a just cause in America, you're just serving the globalists. Don't even try. And that's part of how I think we get undermined, is that we understand, like you say, there's lots of corruption here. The public is not being represented equitably by the American government, these stooges, who, as you're probably aware, got into government now, and have decided to take every third week off. But, it's just important to understand that science is not prevailing as it pertains to Monsanto, because scientists in the field of genetics, for example, they talk about horizontal gene transfer, where if you're an actual scientist and understand the genetics, using the cauliflower mosaic virus to inject a herbicide or an insecticide or making the food resistant to herbicides and insecticides so they can be just covered in poisons to increase yields apparently, for the farmer, does poison the American eater, and the Canadians too. But we understand well enough, those in the science community, that it actually doesn't make sense. We understand that it's a multi-dimensional construct, and when you use the cauliflower mosaic virus, because it's multidimensional Monsanto doesn't want to admit this, because they hold the patent, and if they did, their patents would be void. You run the risk of the signature in the virus being present in the potato. And that's exactly what we had in 2000, where they made a huge crop of potatoes that dissolved the organs of mammals, and they sold it in Taco Bell. Now, we don't know what the total death count is, but we know that they don't rely on science. And yet, the FDA, as you're probably well aware, are connected directly through Monsanto, so it's all perfectly fine. And I believe that those who champion justice, if they have science and the facts on their side, can win a consensus. Consensus doesn't always have to be serving the mastermind global elites who know so much better than you, and you just don't...
Alan: You've got to understand something. We've never had in Canada, since WWII, a true farming industry. We've had a government-run farming industry. And #1, they took out so much of the milk and the qualities of the milk, even with the pasteurization an awful long time ago. And then they homogenized it too, which is far worse than natural milk. Far, far worse, because the stuff literally will clog your arteries, because every molecule is identically the same size, whereas before they were all different ones. It doesn't happen the same way. And then the governments, of course, came out with the handouts to farmers. Well, you get special tax rebates if you sign on our little plans here and there, and before you know it, they're all beholden to government agencies and officials to now regulate their farms for them. That happened since WWII. Why was that? It was because even before they set up the United Nations, they had the League of Nations, and the League of Nations had a Department of Agriculture, as does the United Nations. And they said that farming was too important to be left to farmers. And that the future world they were bringing in, not just in farming, would be run by corporations. Not private individuals or families. Families had to go. And they've been putting them out ever, ever since.
Now, there's very little you can believe in what they're telling you, but Canada is one of the main characters for GMO. In all areas, even in the fish. And it's the government who started it all off, and kicked it off, and ran it. There's videos on youtube from twenty years or fifteen years ago, where every fish going through this little stream was getting picked up, put against this little thing that popped in a new gene into their system, attached to the ecoli of course, that helps to take it deep inside the flesh of the fish, and when the cells of the fish die off, this new gene will take over in its own kind, and reproduce its own kind. So literally, the whole fish is being reengineered. And then they put it back in the water. Thousands upon thousands of them per week were done that way.
Canada is the world's leader in viral and bacterial warfare, and we have been since the beginning of World War II. Canadians are the most passive people who swallow the propaganda that I've ever met in my entire life; I've been across the whole planet. And they're the most easily conned, because they truly are given this yokel country background comedy routine of little old Canada from the 1920s, that never really existed. And they really do believe that the CBC and Peter Mansbridge, the most famous person for the news, "the most trusted man in Canada", is there to tell you the darn truth. Doesn't exist that way.
So, it's no different at all, from the US. It's just better at hiding its corruption than the US. We're far better at it, because we learned from Britain how to hide corruption. And we do it almost perfectly. And even when we don't tell the public, well we're merging you. They told the British a little bit more. There was a bit more flap about it. And there was more reaction from the public, who were inquiring every year with the deeper integration signatories that were put on it. There's nothing happening in Canada, at all. It's just astonishing how they have been trained, just like psychological techniques they've used. They are trained into watching sports, being awfully politically correct. They don't want to offend anybody, even when they should be offending somebody, even on a personal basis. They won't do it. They've been trained in a Pavlovian style to sit back and do nothing, except watch dumb boring movies churned out by your tax money by CBC that nobody watches. And that's the facts of Canada. Back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, we're back, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. And we're still talking to John. And I'd like to add too, before I get back to him, that Canada, and this was all over the mainstream, for about one day, I think it was. That Canada, we were the testing ground for GMO crops and corn and different things. For ten years, because the government had made a secret deal with Monsanto and others, a secret deal to use us as guinea pigs. And that's when, of course, the cancers and all the stomach problems shot up in Canada. They knew that at the federal level, because it's a Socialist country, they have everybody's data from all the doctor's offices and hospitals flooding in daily in real time. And they know exactly what they're doing. And it was only because it broke out in Britain with government, with demonstrations against Blair trying to put it through onto the British public that it emerged, "well, Canada is okay, they've been on it for ten years." We didn't know. No one had told us, and then of course the government had to come forward with their damage control and tell us it was quite safe and so on. But then, about five years later, I went to one of the biggest, massive, it was like a Wal-Mart of fruits and vegetables. Incredible place. Zehrs, they call it. You almost need skates to skate around it. And I asked the manager, I said, where's the non-GMO foods? And he says, "to be honest, I don't know. No one's ever asked that before." And he was telling the truth. That's Canadians. They didn't care. No one had asked him in five years except me, because I kind of like to know what I'm eating. Anyway, is John still there? Are you still there John?
John: Yes, Alan. Yeah, well, you know what, in some respects, it's far worse than what you've articulated. Here's a couple of examples. Our government has openly subsidized Monsanto to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars for their Frankenstein foods.
Alan: They just gave over half a million acres in Canada to Monsanto for testing even more advanced strains of potatoes.
John: Yeah, okay, and if I could just get like thirty seconds here. Health Food Canada Safety. I called them up, I said, listen, here's the science on aspartame. What are you guys going to do? Or what's your position on it? Firstly, the head scientist. Oh, it's deadly poison, John. I wouldn't touch it at all. Save your children. Well, what are you going to do? Are you going to issue a similar statement as they did with BGH and get it out of our systems? He goes, no, if I do that I will be fired. And because we will lose in a law suit that will be orchestrated by the World Trade Organization.
Alan: That's right.
John: So, this is the thing. In Canada, we have no national ability to communicate. CBC takes your name and your phone number and they threaten you. They go, yeah, what did you want to talk about over the phone? What's your last name? Where do you live? We'll call. And then they say, what's your question? I will write it down, and the producer will review your question, and if we decide that you are garnered the respect that a Canadian, we will decide whether you have the respect garnered. We'll call you back. And they threaten you. So, I've been on there once, saying, look, if we have no evidence to substantiate who's good or evil here on 9/11, the bad guys are for sure escaping. So I can never ever talk to them again, because it makes perfect sense, as does science. Monsanto doesn't...
Alan: Yuri Bezmenov was a Soviet spy who defected. And, of course, his videos are up on youtube. He defected in the '80s. And he went to work for the CBC Canada, and he said he met more ardent Marxist Communists there than he did in the Soviet Union. And it hasn't changed to this day. They will not tolerate any other opinion than the one they're told to put forth. You're quite right.
John: Corporatists. They want to sell us out no matter what.
Alan: That's right. Thanks for calling. And Alex from BC, maybe I can get you in next Monday, if you call in. From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it's Good Night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
Topics of
show covered in following links:
Video:
"Zbigniew Brzezinski to Jihadists: Your cause is right!"
(youtube.com).
Brzezinski,
Colour Revolution and Muslim Brotherhood
Militarizing US--Canada Border
Canada Kept Border Talks Under Wraps
Weather is Not Getting "Weirder"
IMF Again Calls for New World Currency
UK Cabinet Office Behavioural Insight Team
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||