April 9th, 2012 (#1061)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt April 9th, 2012:
Goin' Green Will Make You ill (to the tune of "Far Side of the Hill"):
(Chorus)
"Green, Green is Green They Say, No Meat will Make You ill,
Green Green's Not Goin' Away till We're All Dead and Still,
1) Well in This World of Sustainability, We can Never Relax,
Farmers Goin' Green, Hear Them Scream, Hit with
Fartin' Tax,
(Chorus)
2) Gettin' Trained to Eat, No Real Meat, 'cept that Grown in a Tank,
All Skin and Bone, You're Not Alone, Got the U.N.
to Thank,
(Chorus)
3) As We Grow Old We'll All Get Mould, No-one'll Think That Odd,
No Meat or Methane, ain't It a Shame, Green Like
Peas in a Pod"
Let Me Hear You Now -- Chorus
© Alan Watt April 9, 2012
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – April 9th, 2012 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
| cuttingthroughthematrix.com alternate sites: cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca |
mirror site: cuttingthrough.jenkness.com |
| European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up: alanwattsentientsentinel.eu | |
|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS: Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks & Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND – Click the link below for your location (ordering info): |
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on April the 9th, 2012. For newcomers, go into the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You’ll find hundreds of audios for download all for free and I try and give you an understanding into this system you’re born into. Generation after generation it’s the same system that upgrades itself of course, but we’re always lagging behind in understanding where it’s all going because they don’t really tell you their ultimate plans. They give you lots of hints though for those who can take the hints, and there’s lots of information put out by the big boys themselves so that you can see what they’re really, really up to. We’re going into a scientifically controlled world system of course and the plans were designed a long, long time ago by the big foundations which fronted for the big international banking fraternity. And these are the boys who decided a long time ago to take over the whole of the world’s resources, run it in a scientific fashion they called it, reduce population and rewild, all that stuff, discussed over a hundred years ago by some of them who published books on it. So, we’re living through the big change you see; this is time for change– this is the century of change in fact, the 21st century, and that’s what they planned on all that time ago.
So, help yourself to the audios. You’ll find out about the foundations, the organizations they control that control all media of course, and they’ve been at it for an awful long time. So, it’s on track as far as I can see. We’ll touch on some of that tonight.
Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you because I’m not out here to basically sell products that will make you live forever and ever amen. And I don’t own any shares in companies or anything like that that are selling stuff, so it’s up to you, if you like the information, to keep me ticking along here by buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And from the US to Canada, you can use Personal Check or International Postal Money Order from the Post Office or you can send Cash or use PayPal– and Donations are really, really required. Across the world you’ve got Western Union, Money Gram and PayPal once again.
And as I say, what I try to do is to take the old stuff by big players, the old information they put out, who wrote books upon it, who attended world meetings– big parts of the cultural changes and everything you’re seeing right now were made by many of the people who were very prominent in the 40s, 50s, and 60s in fact. They attended lots of world meetings and they set up the United Nations and gave out a lot of information at that time about where they intended to take the United Nations and what it was all really about. They even tried to make it world government right at the end of World War II in fact but unfortunately to them, as far as they were concerned, the people wouldn’t go for it. So they took the Fabian approach, which is the long route, simply by amalgamations and treaties– and that’s all treaties are, is amalgamating countries together, economies together and laws together until you’re really one and the same; it doesn’t matter where you are. And you’ve always got a global government system managing it all– or the “deputies” of them such as the World Trade Organization and we live through this. And of course, the goal is not terribly pleasant at all because what they’re doing to animals they’ll eventually do to all of you– in fact they are doing it to you. At least they’re killing us off fast enough; they’re quite happy with the death rate right now; nothing is a panic even though cancers and everything is through the roof– apparently it’s right on track and no one of course even says it’s a crisis situation, although obviously it is for those dealing with it.
So, we’re living through a big long-term agenda. And I’ve mentioned many of the players; you’ll find their names and some of their books if you listen to the archive section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com– and without that you will not understand what’s happening today. It’s beyond the simply daily exposés that they hand out everyday to terrify us– you’ve got to understand the background.
Back with more after this…
Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about the system. This is the Century for Change and academia called it that, this century, what it was going to be, for 50 years before anybody else heard about it because they were getting trained about it then in all different departments; lots of new departments to do with so-called “sustainability” and things like that. Because the Club of Rome decided a long time ago that in order to get what they wanted, their sustainable planet idea across, they’d have to either find some external enemy to terrify humankind to come together and give up all their rights and obey their masters– they’re talking about a scientific type of dictatorship of course– or, they said that eventually they settled on famine and drought and climate change and things like that; they said “that would fit the bill”. That was their job: to find a reason. And of course, all of the zealots that have been put in charge know this is a con, but it doesn’t matter– it will do the job. And they didn’t stop there with just an idea; they implemented the idea into government long ago. And most treaties today take place without any population’s permission– they’re just done by “leaders” who get together in their global cabals and decide to set up institutions like the G20 for instance. No one was asked about the G20. Since when does your elected representative become an internationalist deciding everybody else’s fate and how much cash will you dish out across the planet and that kind of thing? – and binding treaties with each other? Why not just do away with your own parliament if they’re meeting at the G20 and deciding everything? And that’s how they’ve been doing things for an awful long time.
The United Nations of course was the instrument that was set up to be the kind of nucleus for it all and it was set up on the basis that it would take over the old British Commonwealth countries– they used to call it the Empire but Milner changed it to Commonwealth; it sounds better, less imperialistic– and then America would build on it with the rest of the countries through trade. And trade can be used like a military army in some ways, to give or withhold goods to countries– even food– and therefore the US was to take over the task of promoting this across the planet, by warfare or any other means necessary, which we’ve witnessed and we’re witnessing now. And eventually a Central Bank of the World would be set up and you have your subsections which are basically bloc-sections of central banks– the EU has one now– and each country has its mini one. The big ones are now mini ones as the central banks of the EU bloc takes over and they’re all under the Bank for International Settlements. And that was of course explained in great detail by Carroll Quigley who was the historian for the group that set it all up and planned it in fact.
Another part too is to do with, you know, population. And because we always hear about what’s happening, well, we hear some of what’s happening to us in our own countries in the West, but you don’t realize that it’s across the world. Remember, you have a Trilateral Commission to do with the three main blocs of the planet they were setting up and then you have your G20 for the West and Europe and you also have the G77 for China and all of the Pacific Rim region countries. And we forget about that– that they all have these same institutions set up for different parts of the planet that all work together to bring the same rules, regulations and ideas into fruition and into concrete reality as they bring the world in. It’s kind of like throwing a huge fishing net in the sea and then you pull it in and at the top it comes like a big bag with a loop at the top and you’re pulling it in and it gets narrower and narrower and narrower until you’ve got all the fish trapped in the net– that’s what it’s like. And the only ones who don’t know what’s happening are the fish themselves– that’s what’s happening to all of the populations as you’re entertained to death.
But the signs are all around; lots of people don’t recognize them– they know something’s all wrong. Many groups get really angry about things too but they don’t understand the big picture; this is happening across the whole planet. There’s nothing happening in your country that isn’t happening to all the other countries at the same time. Sometimes laws are passed under different names and sometimes they’re the same names for the same laws to do with bringing in globalism, sustainability, etcetera.
Now I’ve mentioned before that the Chinese are adamant because you see, they’re the showpiece for the United Nations for population control– the “one child per family” idea. And they really enforce it. Mind you, you can get out of it if you’re wealthier, more middle class– because the Chinese have middle class now, good Communists– and they can pay a certain fee to get away with it for a second child and even a third for some families who are really wealthy. But the general population, the peasant class, like everywhere else, you know, has to do what they’re told.
Now, this article I’ve mentioned before and it came out at about the time of Copenhagen because the Chinese sent a delegation over to ensure that the West pushed the same policies as they have and sure enough, unrelated to it of course, that’s how it appeared in the papers who had all these articles coming out in the regular newspapers saying “oh, we should only have one child per family.” Then Australia was hit with it too about CO2 taxes if you have more than one, yada-yada-ya. And other papers followed suit but they never mentioned China because you’re not supposed to think about China being a bit of a boss in all of this too. This article says…
Population and climate change are intertwined but the population issue has remained a blind spot when countries discuss ways to mitigate climate change and slow down global warming
(Alan: So the global warming mantra, climate change fits the bill, remember, so the zealots must repeat it just like Orwell’s zealots in the bureaucratic level in “1984”. It says...)
according to Zhao Baige, vice-minister of National Population and Family Planning Commission of China (NPFPC).
"Dealing with climate change is not simply an issue of CO2 emission reduction but a comprehensive challenge involving political, economic, social, cultural and ecological issues, and the population concern fits right into the picture," said Zhao, who is a member of the Chinese government delegation.
Many studies link population growth with emissions and the effect of climate change.
"Calculations of the contribution of population growth to emissions growth globally produce a consistent finding that most of past population growth has been responsible for between 40 per cent and 60 percent of emissions growth," so stated by the 2009 State of World Population, released earlier by the UN Population Fund.
Now the United Nations Population Fund is about depopulation folks. It’s very Orwellian. And they juggle all this stuff up to terrify mainly the youngsters at school into believing all this stuff so they’ll go along with it all. It’s more important that they do because they’re the breeders you see. They don’t care about the older folk who have decided to do the things that Charles Galton Darwin says, you know, if we can tempt people to go for cars and a luxurious lifestyle rather than have children then we’ll reduce population. Well, that’s already happened in the West. All you have to do is really give them a party every weekend and that’s it, and the Pill– and that’s no kidding. That’s really how it was designed. Bertrand Russell said the same thing, he said forget women’s liberation and all the front organizations, that were put out of course by the United Nations and funded by you the taxpayer, it really was the Pill that gave them liberation– if they call it liberation. But it was all to do with what the elite wanted– it was to depopulate the planet. So here’s the Chinese talking about it too and they’re actually demanding that everyone in the West sticks to the plans that they won’t tell you what the actual level of depopulation is supposed to be– that’s a secret, you see, that your bosses that you think you elect have signed treaties to. And that’s why too there’s no crisis about cancers and things like that. There’s no crisis about males being almost sterile now. No, there’s no crisis. Why is that? It’s because it was planned that way and that’s why you’re going sterile folks. I mean, who’s going to volunteer, eh?
Anyway, that’s the reality of the world you live in. And for those who’ll say, “Well they’d never do that to us,” well, go back to sleep or party or play with your iPhone or something.
And Australia– because it’s under this Pacific Region you see and China is to be the dominant partner, already is in fact, decided long, long ago– is really pushing the envelop to be a compliant little member you see and they’ve got the right Fabian in right now to do it. They always pick women strangely enough when it’s time to really bring the hammer down and that’s why they do, it’s to give an image, a certain image to that type of woman– and there are some of them like that, mind you– but it’s a little laugh by the guys who really control the system. I’ve noticed that down through history.
This article here is from Australia and it says…
GENETICALLY modifying cows so they burp and fart less
(A: I’ll put it this way– I’ll say flatulence for those who’ll get awfully shocked and blush you see. Although the technical term is actually in the dictionary. And it says... )
- that’s one of 40 initiatives to reduce emissions being considered by the cattle and sheep industry.
(A: That’s from both ends basically they’re talking about. So, it says...)
The research is part of 100 initiatives, dubbed Target100,
(A: They always love a name, eh? Target 100.)
aimed at delivering sustainable cattle and sheep farming by 2020.
(A: Now this Tim Flannery is such a joke really. He’s the environmentalist, the "official" one, you know, they call them "scientists" now, guys who believe in a religion like environmentalism and they make them an "expert"– and this guy has been wrong on everything including not building the high enough dams and so on because he said we’d never have lots of rain again and they’ve been flooded two years in a row since then. Anyway, here he goes again. It says he...)
Environmentalist Tim Flannery, who has signed on as the face of the initiative, says sustainability is vital for the long-term survival of the farming industry.
(A: So what does he want to do?)
"Our impact on the environment can be very severe in the agricultural and grazing sectors," he said before the launch of Target100.
"We know historically some of the disasters that have happened, species lost, soil degradation and water degradation and so on."
But limiting the flatulent expulsion of methane gases not only has a positive impact on the environment, but also increases productivity of the animals.
"Methane is a waste," Mr Flannery said.
(A: He said, and...)
"The energy that the cows produce in methane, could have got into producing meat."
No, they don’t want you to get meat down the road. So you know darn well the guy’s a liar on many counts actually. They really don’t want you to have meat. But I’ll read this article, it’s awfully important how they’re really pulling it over on Australia because they’re going to use it and they are using it in the US as well.
Back after this...
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt, we’re Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about the big system and how they con the public really. They always give you a great cause. It’s either a religious cause or something, and really this whole idea of sustainability was decided that they’d make it a religious type cause– it works awfully well. They talked about using the same tactics that religions had used for hundreds and hundreds of years– a belief system, you see. And by repetition and brainwashing the children in school, lots of ads on television, even little quips during comedies and so on, you’d all get the point and it would be reinforced and reinforced until you actually believe it’s real, you see. “The king has no clothes.” It always works. It works awfully well for the majority of the public.
So, here’s again this Flannery in Australia and– I almost called him something else, like “flatulence” there. Anyway, he’s saying here that the energy that cows produce in methane could have gone into producing meat. So he wants them to start breeding the ones that produce less methane with themselves– inbreeding them in other words– and getting rid of those that produce more, you see. So, the farmers have to pay for all these tests and so on, and you know what happens when you inbreed too much: they all start dying off from some little thing that they should be immune to or whatever. But that’s part of the agenda because you see, they don’t want you eating meat down the road– they’ve all said it at the top. A good idea, because some ancient cultures too used to make sure the peasant couldn’t eat meat either. The Egyptians were good for that because the slaves and the general peasant class, the only meat they could eat once in a blue moon– meaning, they didn’t get caught– was from catching a goose or something or a duck, but they couldn’t eat any of the beef; the beef belonged to the pharaoh and of course the bureaucrats all got their slice. So, that’s really how it was. It kept them kind of working okay, but it kept them stunted and short and not too bright you see. And that’s the population you want for a while until they get rid of all of you and purpose-make the humans the way that they want them to do– just like the animals here. I mean, you think about it, they’re talking about animals here to get rid of a particular quality– some would call it a quality, depends how you look upon it or how close you are– but the thing is, the fact is they could do the same with humans too in any way that they want to– and they do want to, in many different ways, change all of us to suit them, you see, but not themselves. Remember what Charles Galton Darwin says, we’ll change all the public genetically and so on, but we ourselves must remain wild creatures because wild creatures have survivability capabilities and we have to run the planet. Remember that? So start with the animals, and they haven’t really started with the animals, they did that initially, but they’re also working on humans big time; you can see it all around you.
So he goes on about all the different initiatives. He says...
Almost half of the 100 initiatives to improve sustainability in farming deal with gas emissions, and include investigating the development of microbes that will help suppress methane production, finding bacteria to metabolise methane and better managing manure.
(A: He says. This is a guy who has probably never lifted a pitchfork in his life you know. The heaviest thing is a fork to his mouth.)
Another platform of the project is giving consumers an opportunity to learn more about how their beef and lamb is produced.
(A: Well, you know, for those who can still go to the occasional barbecue– if you know a local councilor that’s having one– then the last thing you want to talk about as you’re having the darn thing is about how the beef or the lamb is produced, eh. I’m sure you all chat about it. So...)
"Australian cattle and sheep farmers are caretakers...."
Yada-yada-ya, but anyway, the fact is this is the government’s PR agenda for the farmers who are getting smashed already with a lot of different things and fines and so on, the same as Canada, the US and elsewhere.
And I’ll put also another article up to do with the same thing but it’s to do with an organization that puts a lot more alternative news out there and you can see how they’ve got it all down pat really, the whole darn thing to do with methane etcetera is a con and they also show you too that with all these UN biospheres we call them over in Canada, same thing they have over there. Big so-called reservations for animals, the dingos and so on have intermixed with domestic dogs over the years that have gone wild and they’re allowed to go rampaging through the farms killing all the sheep and cattle and so on. So, the government doesn’t do anything about it because you see, dingos have a special hereditary right to do that kind of stuff in Australia according to them.
And also in Britain…Britain’s quite something else, because that article I read last week was so true; the people never really rebel, they just take it and take it and take it and they keep voting, you know. It’s like keeping grabbing the same straws when you’re drowning because you think it’s stuck to the ground somewhere and you might get a lift-up and you find it just slips out and you go under and you keep voting the same way because one’s a red one, one’s a green one, one’s a blue one and so on– nice colors aren’t they? It says here…
Homeowners could be forced to pay for eco-friendly renovations...
(A: Now supposing you smashed a window or somebody put a ball through the window or whatever. So, you could be forced to pay for eco-friendly renovations when you want to make simple household repairs under plans being considered by the government.)
when they want to make simple household repairs under plans being considered by the Government.
(A: See, they couldn’t get everybody to go for all this enviro-proofing your home stuff with the tiny little grants the governments gave you, and then they got lots of people on the grants in all the different countries in the West, and then halfway through they pulled the grants away and just forgot all about them and left you with the massive tab you see. So they’re going to do it by force now. So you break your window and you go to the hardware store and they won’t sell it unless you get a little chitty from the government saying you’re going to also do your attic and put more insulation in and stuff like that.)
The scheme would affect people installing windows, boilers (A: for water) or even conservatories in what has been dubbed a ‘green tax’.
Local councils would be given powers to make you add a new roof and wall insulation or draught proofing on doors before giving you the go-ahead.
Well don’t tell them you’re fixing the window and get glass in advance folks, if I’m telling you…
Back with more after this...
Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about, not just Britain but this article is about Britain, but it’s an example of what’s happening across the world as they all– I don’t want to say that “G” word again because I’d rather go colorblind, it’s so disgusting how they tack it on to everything. It said here that…
If approved, the new rules would come into force in April 2014 and they could add 10% (A: ughhh) ‘green’ levy to a building project, according to the Daily Mail.
It said those struggling to meet the extra cost
(A: So if you’re poor to start with, right, you...)
could borrow cash under the Coalition’s (A: the government’s) Green Deal (A: ughhh) scheme, repaying the amount through an extra charge on energy bills.
(A: So they’ll tack it on to your energy bills you see. Ok, I broke a window. “Oh, you can’t replace that until you fix your attic. You can borrow some money from us at low interest, eh”– and so on.)
Officials at the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG)
(A: Department for Communities and Local Government. It’s amazing how they keep changing it eh? There is actually a department for communities and local government. That’s communitarianism.)
said the measures, which are under consultation, would be "mandatory"
(A: There’s democracy in action.)
unless homes already had a high energy performance rating.
(A: That’s the very wealthy!)
Measures listed in the Whitehall plans are believe to include hot water cylinder insulation and draught proofing.
It’s just your typical stuff as they go on this roll and it’s really a roll they’re on now because I get so many people sending me the same links sometimes and you see they want you to talk about all these different things and keep repeating the buzzwords until you say it quite naturally and start to believe it. You understand? That’s also what they do. It’s called trending– they create the trends and everybody grabs on them. Remember too I’ve mentioned so many times that before main meetings are scheduled to come up, from their own website I read it a few years ago, they said that we always have to terrify the public– terrify is the word they used– into believing that the world’s going to come to a dead end unless we do all of these things, horrible things will happen. So, exaggerate everything, you see. And so, sure enough, that’s what they’re doing because the Rio+20 Summit is in June and that’s going to be the big, big one that all the other different branches of it will come under in their new push towards depopulation, under the guise of sustainability and so on, and austerity of course. You must all be austere– awfully poor– because your spending money has to go into fees like this one here to fix your broken window and then you end up fixing the attic and all the rest of it. You see, that’s how they’re going to do it all. We’re post consumerist remember and you’ve all to live in your communities and get rid of those nasty cars because under Agenda 21, from the United Nations, there’s to be no private vehicles– they’ll get there, they’ll get there no problem about it. Because people won’t do anything about it you see. And another article about the same thing from a different paper, I’ll put that up too, explaining the same darn thing and how they’re going to do it.
And this one here, that Australian one that I mentioned earlier that gives you alternate news, is SOS News, I’ll put the link up for that tonight too. They’ve got some videos and for those who’ve got a squeamish stomach and don’t want to see wild dogs or dingos bringing down the farm animals or what’s left of them too sometimes, don’t look at it, or at least not the video parts, it’s up to yourselves. Mind you, you can watch wars and all that, and bombing guys over in the Middle East but that doesn’t really bother you much anyway, so maybe you can. It’s true enough; they get more upset over animals and trees getting uprooted than people.
And I mentioned years ago too about when the bee colony disorders happened that I already knew about it before anything came into the papers because I know bee keepers and they’d noticed already of course that when the GM stuff was in its test beds they knew that their bees that were going off in those directions were coming back drowsy and they’d lie around and simply die, and they said it was either due to the GM food itself, which produces its own pesticide and the vegetables, and or also the types of pesticides they were using on them. There’s no doubt about it because one of the guys I knew mapped it all out to do with all the different beekeepers and where they were coming back from because bees go in different directions– all your different hives– and the beekeeper knows that too. And so they know where they’ve been and where they’re coming from and where they’ll always go to and come back from. And he mapped it all out and sent it to the Minister of Agriculture in Canada and they had to admit they had secret test beds on the GM vegetables at the time, so it was obvious to them right off the bat what was happening. Of course there was all this pooh-poohing and “oh, it’s a mystery” stuff for years. Anyway…
Controversy Deepens Over Pesticides and Bee Collapse
A controversial new study of honeybee deaths has deepened a bitter dispute over whether the developed world’s most popular pesticides are causing an ecological catastrophe.
(A: It’s like the ongoing Bisphenol A with humans– you know, as guys turn into women– does it really affect them or does it not? It will go on forever because they don’t want to stop it; this is part of the agenda. Anyway...)
Researchers led by biologist Chensheng Lu of Harvard University report a direct link between hive health and dietary exposure to imidacloprid, a so-called neonicotinoid (A: It’s nicotine actually they use it from.) pesticide linked to colony collapse disorder, the mysterious and massive die-off of bees across North America and Europe.
(A: It’s not just that one by the way. It’s great too how they can mislead you by a particular article and you think that’s all it’s about, and it’s really to lead you away from all the other stuff they’re using on these crops. Anyway, it says...)
The study isn’t without critics, who say doses used in the study may be unrealistically high. But the level of a realistic dose is also a matter of controversy, and even critics say the findings are troubling.
“Our result replicates colony collapse disorder as a result of pesticide exposures,” said Lu, who specializes in environmental exposures to pesticides. “We need to look at our agriculture policy and see if what we’re doing now is sustainable.”
(A: Everything is sustainable or unsustainable now, eh?)
Developed in the 1990s as a relatively less-toxic alternative to pesticides that seriously harmed human health,
(A: Of course which they denied all the time, that pesticides harmed human health! It says, this new one..)
neonicotinoids soon became the world’s fastest-growing pesticide class and an integral part of industrial agricultural strategy. In the United States alone, neonicotinoid-treated corn now covers a total area slightly smaller than the state of Montana.
(A: So anyway, it’s the Bayer company that runs it and nothing will probably happen I’d imagine. What’s interesting here too though is to do with what else is in this particular pesticide because it says…)
‘These pesticides are everywhere, every year. We’ve never used pesticides in the way we’re using them now.’
(A: So it’s massively used. And it says...)
Some European countries, including France, Germany and Italy, have even banned neonicotinoids, though pesticide companies vehemently defend their ecological safety....
(A: Anyway it goes on to say...)
“We tried to mimic commercial beekeepers’ practices....”
(A: They found that supplements of high-fructose corn syrup...)
... may contain neonicotinoid residues that survive processing.
(A: So it’s still in it, this fructose corn syrup stuff that’s in it, and they say this is also affecting the bees and maybe killing them as well. This is the stuff by the way the beekeepers were told to supplement the bees when they take too much honey away for the winter– they actually add that to them so they can eat it and that’s also affecting them too, obviously. It affects humans. We’ve had lots and lots of studies on humans with high-fructose corn syrup which is in everything. If you want to stay fairly healthy stay away from anything with high-fructose corn syrup in it– it’s all GM as well. By the way, if even traces are bad for the bees, of this stuff, you can imagine traces of the pesticides which they actually used on the modified corn in the first place and that will be in the stuff too– you can’t get rid of it.)
“We tried to mimic commercial beekeepers’ practices. I believe one reason that commercial beekeepers are experiencing the most severe colony collapse disorder is because of the link between high-fructose corn syrup and neonicotinoids,” Lu said.
So, he does a fairly detailed investigation into it, but once again you’re left with “this group vs. that group” because that’s how most things end up when it’s actually true, they just keep it up in the air for as long as they can, because every day is money, right? That’s how it works out.
Another article too I’ll put up tonight, I’ve mentioned it so many times, at least some of the US states have got wind of what’s going on with the ICLEI, and that’s an organization that appoints members to your local council. Members of your local council can be members too and then bring you all on board with it without you even knowing they’re doing it. But it’s across the whole planet actually– it’s not just the US– but it’s Local Governments for Sustainability. It says...
ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability is an association of over 1220 local government Members who are committed to sustainable development.
(A: Here we are again, you see.)
Our Members come from 70 different countries and represent more than 569,885,000 people.
ICLEI is an international association of local governments as well as national and regional local government organizations
(A: That’s NGOs as well.)
who have made a commitment to sustainable development.
(A: Now what is a "commitment"? Is it signed into law as a treaty? How is it done? You better find out you see, because a lot of your tax money is going to these creeps now who shouldn’t even be on your councils. You’re supposed to elect a council to look after you and your area, not the planet. And never mind the fact that it’s a United Nations organization too, under that umbrella you see, that then starts to dictate to you with no legal authority. But you all go along with it because you don’t know what it’s all about. So it says...)
ICLEI provides technical consulting, training, and information services to build capacity, share knowledge, and support local government in the implementation of sustainable development at the local level. Our basic premise is that locally designed initiatives (A: you see) can provide an effective and cost-efficient way to achieve local, national, and global sustainability objectives.
(A: Well, who signed what? Do you get a chance to vote for any of these characters at all? Do they mention any of this stuff when they’re running for election, even in your local council? Same as your presidents and prime ministers– do they talk about all this agenda when they’re running? Oh no, it’s jobs and welfare, schooling and that kind of stuff. You see, we’re international– we’ve been international for a long time, invaded from within basically– from within because they’re all amongst you, these creeps. They’re little spies everywhere and agents and they get into all the different organizations that run your lives. So it says...)
ICLEI was founded in 1990 as the ‘International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives’. The Council was established when more than 200 local governments from 43 countries convened at our inaugural conference, the World Congress of Local Governments for a Sustainable Future, at the United Nations in New York.
(A: Well, it’s about time someone spelled out the power and legality of the United Nations to us all. Because as I say, why not just vote these guys in– you know, we don’t know who’s in the United Nations except for the main character at the top. Why don’t we just vote for them and do away with all these front men, obviously they have to be front men– presidents, prime ministers, bureaucrats, all the rest of them– if the United Nations is running the show? Which is it? No one asks about it, eh? It’s like being born with a wart on your nose, it’s always there, so you accept it as normal. Anyway...)
The organization’s name is ‘ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
(A: Is what they call ICLEI; that’s what they say it stands for.)
In 2003, ICLEI’s Members voted to revise the organization’s mission, charter and name to better reflect the current challenges local governments are facing.
But once they’re into office they start telling you all what to do in your local councils. You understand too, a lot of your local tax money goes abroad. Not just your local, your state, or provincial in Canada, and federal, it’s from every darn level it goes abroad. Even your cities designate so much money to go abroad to other countries to help them. I thought charity was voluntary. You’re not under what you think of as "democracy"; you never have been.
Anyway, as I say, I’ll put up the links for that too about them even in Hamilton. I was reading about them in Hamilton Ontario today too and how once they got in there they started demanding that the Hamilton Ontario government starts going along with all these different programs, which cost a lot of cash. And the public in Hamilton probably know nothing about it, except their taxes keep going up, you know. As I say, it’s just astonishing.
We live in a little bubble; each person lives in a bubble and that’s natural; it’s actually encouraged as well. But you live in a bubble. You don’t have time to look across the whole planet to see who is affecting you, who’s got his eye on your little bit of dirt that you live on or whatever. You don’t have that kind of time. And you expect, having a sort of tribal instinct, that the ones that are elected to be the “chief” are going to look after you. And unfortunately in this system it doesn’t work anymore. You’ve got to look after yourself, because your chief is compromised– all your chiefs are. And they know it before they run for office, at every level, every single level.
And this article here, they talk about the cops don’t get quotas. We’ve had this before. Toronto is a good example where they were caught many times having quotas. In fact, the government said that it would collapse when the cops went on strike in Toronto once because they expect so much in fines every year; if it’s not coming in then they actually go down the tubes basically. So they’re an essential part of bringing cash in. This one here is in the States, it’s Connecticut. And it says here…
An eye-opening state police internal memorandum obtained by News 8 challenges state troopers in one barracks to out-perform their trooper colleagues by writing hundreds of tickets on Friday.
(A: So, different trooper areas, barracks they call them, are having bets with each other on how many tickets they can hand out– same as Britain– and it’s encouraged at the top you see, where they bring in cops from different areas who compete with each other to see how many tickets they can hand out on the roads that day. You understand, these are predators preying upon the public. It says...)
The memo, distributed at Troop I in Bethany and obtained exclusively by News 8, basically lays down the gauntlet and any driver on a state highway is fair game.
According to this document, starting tonight at midnight, patrols will be stepped up.
(A: This has already happened I think.)
The memo from Lt. Anthony Schirillo says in part;
"...we have to issue at least 60 infractions / Misdemeanors each shift for a total of 180 infractions in order to outperform both Troop F and Troop G.
"...One day Troop F issued 301 tickets. Troop G responded by issuing 345 in one day. We can do better...
(A: Said the memo.)
"I am asking that everyone, myself included, contribute to this effort...
So, there you have it. I mean, you understand people are playing with us all for fun? But it’s encouraged at the top because a lot of cash comes in you see. It’s nothing to do with right or wrong or anything else; it’s just persecute the pubic. Of course too, eventually it will help you all, when it really steps up, you’ll get out of your car because what’s the point in having it when you’re getting tickets everyday?
Back with more after this…
Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through the Matrix. And we’ll go to callers and there’s Steve from Indiana hanging on there. Are you still there Steve?
Steve: This is Steve. Yeah Alan, I wanted to share an experience I had in the 80s. The Air Force stuck me out in the middle of New Jersey and I was stuck with half civilians, and one day I heard a lot of people talking about they had to do some work inside the middle of their house. And then they actually said that they were waiting for their “permit” to do a little bit of work in the middle of their house, and I said “well how are people going to know what you’re doing?” They said, “well, that’s the law.”
Alan: It’s the law, yeah.
Steve: If people were so far gone back then that, you know, I’m concerned that when they really start pulling that here in the States that it’s not going to be hard for them to do it.
Alan: I know, I’ve seen that myself up here in Canada too, rather than just go ahead and do something and fix something, they have to go and get permission from their masters, even if they’re 100 miles away they’ll still do it.
Steve: Yeah, I never forgot that day and I was just looking at these people, like, “why do you need a permit to do something in the middle of your house?” and they said, “well it’s the law.”
Alan: Well, I’ll tell you too, I actually heard a guy once saying, “well, it’s for tax purposes” because apparently if you improve anything inside your house as well then your taxes will go up if the tax man knows about it. And this happened already in other countries. Britain was bad for it, where you’d put in a sliding door or something and up went your taxes because you’d improved the house. So, the people are so conditioned and brainwashed into compliance. It’s a servant-master relationship, isn’t it?
Steve: Absolutely. And the other thing that I experienced, now this was in the mid-80s and I found myself surrounded by people that– I don’t know if they had low IQ’s, but the people that– went along with everything the military told you, you moved up in rank quick; and then if you didn’t go along and you questioned anything you had problems, and I went through that myself.
Alan: Yes, there’s no doubt about it. There’s no doubt at all, they want instant compliance.
Steve: And then the other thing I want to confirm that you have mentioned numerous times is that what they would do is they would screen out people that would not go along and question and they would get rid of the people and they would make stuff up. Plus it would make them look like they were doing their own job.
Alan: Sure, oh yeah.
Steve: So, I just wanted to add that story
Alan: That’s the way it is.
Steve: Okay, I’ll let you go if you’ve got someone else there holding, Alan. Thanks a lot.
Alan: Okay, thanks for calling. And there’s Bobby from Massachusetts there, are you there Bobby?
Bobby: Hello Alan. I wanted to call in because of the rare topic of beekeeping and bees. I knew a beekeeper here in Massachusetts that was brought in from Switzerland and he said that he had never seen such wrong with the bees and that almost every bee had to be foreignly brought in here because of the contamination in the land. And it’s quite shocking to hear these things, but if you ask the average person this, they’re still not getting it, you know. It just doesn’t make sense to them.
Alan: They’re not getting it. What they’ve found out even with the various sugars that they’re feeding them, the artificial sweeteners and so on, as I mentioned earlier too, it’s making them very open to death by other means, like the mites and so on that they used to be resistant to, and it has a lot of effects on them. And yeah, beekeepers at one time didn’t have to keep ordering out of the country and bringing ones in all the time as they are today. It’s very expensive and also the governments too are down on the beekeepers like you would not believe– and Canada too. Lots of them are put under by the governments themselves; they come along and oh, you’ve got this, you’ve got that wrong; you’ve got to have stainless steel things to get the honey out of the combs now and an office for the inspector to go in and sit in while he inspects all the damned honey. Who can afford that?
Bobby: Alright, thanks a lot Alan
Alan: Thanks for calling.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God or your Gods go with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
China on Board with "Too Many People
Bandwagon"
Australia and Genetically Engineering Cows with
Manners
More on the Breeding of Aristocratic Cows
Aussie Protest
News Site---SOS-News
Green Tax and Mandatory Renovations--UK
Green Plans mean 10% Bills Hike
Pesticides and Bee Colony Collapse
About
ICLEI
ICLEI---Example
of Techniques
Police Games for Ticket Count
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||